Frequently Asked Questions are used to provide additional information and/or statutory guidance not found in State Medicaid Director Letters, State Health Official Letters, or CMCS Informational Bulletins. The different sets of FAQs as originally released can be accessed below.
Frequently Asked Questions
If the supervising physician does not self-attest to the physician specialty or subspecialty qualification under CMS 2370-F, can the physician supervise a mid-level provider? If the supervising physician self-attests to the 60 percent threshold, but not one of the defined specialty or subspecialty qualifications, can the physician supervise a mid-level?
The eligibility of services provided by mid-level/non-physician practitioners is dependent on 1) the eligibility of the physician and 2) whether or not the physician accepts professional responsibility for the services provided by the mid-level. As previously noted, physicians are eligible only if they first self-attest to a specified specialty designation and also to either being appropriately Board certified or having a 60 percent claims history.
Supplemental Links:
ÂFAQ ID:92711
SHARE URLIs it permissible for states with Medicare geographic adjustments that opt to develop rates based on the mean Medicare rate over all counties for each Evaluation & Management code under CMS 2370-F to use a weighted mean based on either the county population or the county Medicaid enrollment?
We believe this would be acceptable. However, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) would review the methodology as part of the SPA approval process.
Supplemental Links:
ÂFAQ ID:92716
SHARE URLIf a state were to proceed with implementation on January 1, 2013, and submit a state plan by March 31, 2013, would the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) permit the state to claim the enhanced match for services that were reimbursed at the higher rate under CMS 2370-F prior to approval of the state plan?
No. As noted in the final rule, Federal Financial Participation (FFP) in increased rates will not be available until the State Plan Amendment (SPA) is approved.
Supplemental Links:
ÂFAQ ID:92721
SHARE URLWill states still be required to convert their income counting methodology to Modified Adjusted Gross Income (MAGI) for purposes of determining eligibility regardless of whether they expand to the adult group? If so, how do states link the categorical eligibility criteria to the MAGI?
Yes, as required by law. Conversion to modified adjusted gross income eligibility rules will apply to the nonelderly, nondisabled eligibility groups covered in each state, effective January 2014, without regard to whether a state expands coverage to the low-income adult group. The new modified adjusted gross income rules are aligned with the income rules that will be applied for determination of eligibility for premium tax credits and cost-sharing reductions through Exchanges; the application of modified adjusted gross income to Medicaid and CHIP will promote a simplified, accurate, fair, and coordinated approach to enrollment for consumers. CMS has been working with states to move forward with implementation of the modified adjusted gross income rules, and consolidation and simplification of Medicaid eligibility categories.
Supplemental Links:
- This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 359.41 KB)
FAQ ID:94621
SHARE URLWill children enrolled in CHIP as of March 23, 2010 who become eligible for Medicaid as a result of the conversion to Modified Adjusted Gross Income (MAGI) and the expansion of Medicaid coverage for children up to 133 percent of the FPL, be eligible for the CHIP enhanced FMAP?
Yes. CHIP enhanced FMAP will continue to be available for children whose income is greater than the Medicaid applicable income level (defined in section 457.301 and based on the 1997 Medicaid income standard for children), regardless of whether those children are enrolled in Medicaid or CHIP. This includes children who previously qualified for CHIP in a separate program and children whose family incomes are up to 133 percent of the Federal poverty level, and therefore will be newly eligible for Medicaid in 2014.
Supplemental Links:
ÂFAQ ID:93061
SHARE URLWill States need to add a separate CHIP coverage group in order to meet the requirements of section 2101(f) of the Affordable Care Act, the provision that requires States to ensure continuity of coverage for children who lose Medicaid eligibility as a result of the conversion to MAGI?
Yes. Section 2101(f) of the Affordable Care Act provides that States maintain coverage under a separate CHIP program for children who lose Medicaid eligibility due to the elimination of income disregards as a result of the conversion to MAGI. We anticipate that this provision will directly impact a relatively small number of children, and are committed to helping States implement this provision in a manner that is not unduly burdensome or costly and still protects the continuity of coverage for these children as required by statute.
For States with only Medicaid Expansion CHIPs, one approach is to create a separate CHIP that is substantively identical to the existing program, thereby creating the greatest continuity of coverage for the child, the least confusion for the family, and the most efficient operation for the state. For States with existing separate CHIPs, a State plan amendment assuring that these children will be covered through that program for as long as they qualify should be sufficient.
Supplemental Links:
ÂFAQ ID:93066
SHARE URL
Results per page