Frequently Asked Questions

Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) can reimburse states for expenditures incurred by Local Education Agencies (LEAs)/school districts for the costs of administrative activities that support the provision of medical services covered under Medicaid or CHIP. Examples of allowable Medicaid and CHIP administrative activities can be found on page 75 of the 2023 Comprehensive Guide to Medicaid Services and Administrative Claiming. In general, some categories where administrative activities can fall include:

• Medicaid and CHIP outreach.
• Facilitating Medicaid and CHIP eligibility determinations.
• Transportation-related activities in support of Medicaid and CHIP services.
  • Note, when the State claims federal financial participation (FFP) for necessary transportation as an optional medical service, the State must not also claim the same transportation expenditures as an administrative activity, which would result in duplicative reimbursement.
• Translation and interpretation services related to covered services.
• Program planning, policy development, and interagency coordination related to Medicaid and CHIP.
• Medicaid- and CHIP-related training.
• Referral, coordination, and monitoring of Medicaid and CHIP services (distinct from case management activities covered as a medical service).

FAQ ID:162306

Yes, States are expected to apply the 2023 Comprehensive Guide to Medicaid Services and Administrative Claiming guidance to all MAC programs for all entities. Both previous guidance documents issued by CMS, including the 1997 School-based Services Technical Review Guide and the 2003 School-based Administrative Claiming Guide, are superseded by the 2023 Comprehensive Guide to Medicaid Services and Administrative Claiming.

FAQ ID:162336

First, the activities must be allowable as State program administrative activities. Secondly, the State and/or claiming unit must implement a methodology to properly identify and allocate Medicaid’s portion of cost associated with the allowable State program administrative activity. Finally, the identification and allocation of this cost must be documented in the State’s Public Assistance Cost Allocation Plan (PACAP). According to 45 C.F.R. § 95.517, State Medicaid agencies (SMAs) that intend to claim for allowable administrative activities must have an approved PACAP. As the PACAP is primarily used by the Federal cognizant agency to allocate cost incurred by one direct federal awardee, yet funded by another federal awardee, there may be instances where costs applicable to allowable State program activities are incurred and funded by the SMA. In this instance, the State may identify and allocate the cost via a Medicaid Administrative Claiming (MAC) Plan and include a reference to the identification and allocation of the cost via the MAC Plan in its PACAP.

FAQ ID:162321

CMS encourages SMAs to reimburse school districts their allowable costs of conducting Medicaid and CHIP administrative activities. School districts should work with SMAs to develop a plan to document their costs so that the SMA can distribute Medicaid and CHIP FFP to school districts in proportion to each district’s relative expenditures for Medicaid and CHIP administrative activities.

FAQ ID:162326

The technical specifications and webinar materials for these measures are available on the MLTSS page:

• Technical specifications (PDF, 532.99 KB)
• Value sets (XLSX, 2.88 MB)
• Risk adjustment tables (XLSX, 59.69 KB)
• Webinar slides (PDF, 1014.2 KB)
• Webinar recording

FAQ ID:89021

If you have additional questions about these measures, please submit your question to the technical assistance mailbox at MLTSSmeasures@cms.hhs.gov for assistance.

FAQ ID:89026

As more states shift to MLTSS and gain more experience, the need to measure program outcomes and quality has increased. The new quality measures, which were carefully designed for beneficiaries enrolled in MLTSS plans, represent a major step forward in giving the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), states, MLTSS plans, providers, and consumers the ability to compare the performance of MLTSS programs and plans within and across states. Specifically, CMS wanted to create nationally-standardized measures meeting importance, usability, feasibility, and scientific validity and reliability standards for use across MLTSS plans and state Medicaid programs to fill key gaps in MLTSS measure domains while not duplicating other measures that have been developed or are currently under development.

FAQ ID:89031

No, CMS does not require states or MLTSS plans to report these measures. However, states may choose to require plans to report any of these measures to the state Medicaid agency.

FAQ ID:89036

Through our discussions with MLTSS plans, we learned that plans—particularly those operating in multiple states—can ease the burden of data collection by mapping their existing assessment and care plan tools to the standardized data elements and terminology in these measures, which would make it easier to abstract data and standardize the data collection process. It is also important for MLTSS plan managers to train staff to document assessment and care plan elements consistently, as well as train individuals responsible for collecting data on how to interpret each of the elements specified in each measure. Plans can also ease the burden of data collection by ensuring data from multiple sources are consolidated into a central data system.

FAQ ID:89041

Managed Long Term Services and Supports (MLTSS) plan managers should provide training on proper documentation practices to care managers and other delegated staff. States and MLTSS plans could consider including data field entry options to remind care managers to record all results of the assessment, even if findings are negative, that is, the member does not have a problem or need assistance or services. For example, states and plans could include a question in the member’s record that requires the care manager to document both whether an assessment was performed and whether a problem was identified, along with another required field to include the details of the problem if there was a problem identified.

FAQ ID:89046