U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Frequently Asked Questions

Frequently Asked Questions are used to provide additional information and/or statutory guidance not found in State Medicaid Director Letters, State Health Official Letters, or CMCS Informational Bulletins. The different sets of FAQs as originally released can be accessed below.

Showing 1 to 10 of 43 results

Should the rate of required exclusions be reported with the Screening, Risk Assessment, and Plan of Care to Prevent Future Falls measure's Part 1 performance rate?

The measure excludes plan members who are not ambulatory from the measure rate, but it is not necessary to report the number of members excluded with the measure’s performance rate.

FAQ ID:89006

SHARE URL

Is a specific screening tool required for the Screening, Risk Assessment, and Plan of Care to Prevent Future Falls measure?

No, a specific screening tool is not required for this measure. However, potential screening tools may include the Morse Fall Scale and timed Get-Up-And-Go test.

FAQ ID:89011

SHARE URL

What is the difference between a screening (Part 1) and a risk assessment (Part 2) for the purposes of calculating the Screening, Risk Assessment, and Plan of Care to Prevent Future Falls measure?

A falls screening is an evaluation of whether a Managed Long Term Services and Supports plan member has experienced a history of falls and/or problems with balance or gait. A falls risk assessment includes a balance/gait assessment and one other assessment component and should only be performed for members with a documented history of falls (at least two falls or one fall with injury in the past year).

FAQ ID:89016

SHARE URL

What is the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A -87 Exception?

OMB Circular A-87requires costs associated with building shared state-based Information Technology (IT) systems that support multiple health and human service programs be allocated across all benefitting programs in proportion to their use of the system. The OMB A-87 Exception revised this approach by allowing human service programs (e.g. SNAP, TANF, LIHEAP, etc.) and others to utilize a wide range of IT components, needed by Medicaid but also of use to these other programs, at no additional cost except for interfaces or other uniquely required services specific to those programs. The A-87 Exception applies only to design, development, and implementation. Maintenance and operations work should continue to be allocated in accordance with the A-87 Circular. OMB Circular A-87  â€“ Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian Tribal Governments, has been Relocated to 2 CFR, Part 225 .

FAQ ID:93611

SHARE URL

When does the OMB A-87 Exception expire?

On July 20, 2015, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the U.S. Department of Agriculture announced a three-year extension of the Exception to the OMB A-87 cost allocation requirements from December 31, 2015 to December 31, 2018. We are currently making plans for the OMB A-87 exception to end.

FAQ ID:93616

SHARE URL

What is the impact of the OMB A-87 expiration for states utilizing the exception for system integration development?

States will need to incur costs for goods and services furnished no later than December 31, 2018 to make use of this Exception. Therefore, if work is completed by December 31, 2018, it can be funded under the OMB A-87 Exception and states should follow typical invoicing and claiming processes. However, if an amount has been obligated by December 31, 2018, but the good or service is not furnished by that date, then such expenditure must be cost allocated by program in proportion to their use of the system in accordance with OMB A-87.

FAQ ID:93621

SHARE URL

How should states account for OMB A-87 exception in their Advance Planning Documents (APD)

For FFY2019 annual APDs and budget tables, including the Medicaid Detailed Budget Table (MDBT), must be completed as follows:

  • For Q1 FFY2019, states can allocate costs in accordance with the OMB A-87 Exception
  • For Q2-Q$ FFY2019, and all APDs going forward, states should allocate costs as required under the OMB A-87 Circular

If a state has already submitted their annual APDs without providing separate budgets they will need to complete an APDU with a revised MDBT and cost allocation plan. The update should address how cost allocation will be done prior to, and after, December 31, 2018. Budget tables should be completed as described above.

The Data and Systems Group (DSG) that approves APDs does not approve cost allocation methodology. States working to develop their new methodologies should send operational cost allocation plans to Cost Allocation Services  and the regional office fiscal staff for all benefiting programs.

FAQ ID:93626

SHARE URL

If a state submits a state plan amendment (SPA) to reduce payment rates for durable medical equipment (DME) to avoid a reduction of federal financial participation (FFP) under 1903(i)(27), would a state still be required to conduct and submit an annual DME demonstration of state expenditures?

It depends on the individual state plan amendment, but if a state submitted a state plan amendment to cover the relevant DME at or below what Medicare would pay for the same items and that was effective January 1, 2018, then a state would be considered to have demonstrated compliance with the statute and be exempt from submitting a DME FFP limit demonstration. If the state does not currently use Medicare’s payment rates (or a lesser percentage thereof) to reimburse providers for DME, the state may submit a SPA to alter its DME reimbursement methodology to set rates at or below the applicable Medicare rates. If there are competitive bidding areas (CBAs) in the state as defined by Medicare, it may choose to either pay the competitive bidding single payment amount for DME in the applicable CBA of the state under the Medicare program, or could set the statewide plan rate at the lesser of the durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics and supplies fee schedule rate, including rural and non-rural areas as defined by Medicare, or the competitive bid single payment amount under the Medicare CBA for the item. States should be aware that if a SPA is submitted to align Medicaid payment rates to Medicare and is effective after January 1, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) will require the submission of a demonstration for the year in which a SPA is submitted to ensure compliance with the statute for a full calendar year. Once payment rates are set at Medicare rates for a full calendar year, CMS will consider the state as being compliant with the statute through the state plan.

FAQ ID:93551

SHARE URL

Will public notice be required for state plan amendments (SPAs) that are submitted to comply with the statute or is this methodology change exempt?

In general, public notice is required for any changes in statewide methods and standards for setting payment rates as described in 42 CFR 447.205. Public notice must be published one day prior to the effective date of the SPA. If there are specific questions about this policy, please contact the Medicaid durable medical equipment team by email at: MedicaidDME@cms.hhs.gov.

FAQ ID:93556

SHARE URL

Can a state be exempt from the durable medical equipment (DME) federal financial participation (FFP) limit demonstration if they can show that the state's state plan and/or regulations or statues don't allow payments in excess of the new limit?

A simple statement by a state that its payments for DME will not exceed the FFP limit would not be adequate. The statute establishes a limit on the Secretary’s ability to pay FFP, and we must follow the statutory restrictions. We have discussed two potential approaches that a state might use in the January 4, 2018 letter. Any state that wishes to discuss alternative approaches under the State Medicaid Director Letter should contact the Medicaid DME team with all of the information relevant to their request as early in the year as possible.

FAQ ID:93561

SHARE URL
Results per page