U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Frequently Asked Questions

Frequently Asked Questions are used to provide additional information and/or statutory guidance not found in State Medicaid Director Letters, State Health Official Letters, or CMCS Informational Bulletins. The different sets of FAQs as originally released can be accessed below.

Showing 1 to 10 of 19 results

Do the data elements comprising the falls risk assessment need to be documented as part of a comprehensive assessment?

No. Although a comprehensive assessment may include falls risk assessment elements, this measure does not require the risk assessment elements to be documented as part of a comprehensive assessment. For this measure, a falls risk assessment is considered complete if the member record includes any documentation of a balance/gait assessment, and documentation of assessment of postural blood pressure, vision, home fall hazards, and/or medications.

FAQ ID:88961

SHARE URL

Do the components of the risk assessment need to be completed during a single encounter?

No, the components can be completed during separate encounters, provided they are documented in the member record as having been performed between August 1 of the year prior to the measurement year and December 31 of the measurement year.

FAQ ID:88966

SHARE URL

Is a standardized tool required for assessment of balance/gait?

No, a standardized tool is not required, although documentation of use of a standardized tool (for example, Get Up & Go, Berg, Tinetti) would meet the balance/gait assessment component of the measure.

FAQ ID:88971

SHARE URL

Can the same standardized tool be used to conduct screening (Part 1) and risk assessment (Part 2)?

Yes, the same tool may be used to conduct the screening and risk assessment for the Screening, Risk Assessment, and Plan of Care to Prevent Future Falls measure.

FAQ ID:88986

SHARE URL

Do the data elements comprising the plan of care to prevent future falls need to be documented as part of a comprehensive care plan?

No. Although a comprehensive care plan may include the elements comprising a plan of care to prevent future falls, the measure does not require the plan of care elements to be documented as part of a comprehensive care plan. For this measure, a plan of care is considered complete if the member record includes any documentation of exercise therapy or referral to exercise between August 1 of the year prior to the measurement year and December 31 of the measurement year.

FAQ ID:88991

SHARE URL

Should the rate of required exclusions be reported with the Screening, Risk Assessment, and Plan of Care to Prevent Future Falls measure's Part 2 performance rate?

Yes, the rate of exclusion for members who refused an assessment and/or a plan of care needs to be reported with the measure’s performance rate.

FAQ ID:88996

SHARE URL

Can the same sample for Part 2 of the Screening, Risk Assessment, and Plan of Care to Prevent Future Falls measure be used for other measures?

No, the sample for Part 2 of the Screening, Risk Assessment, and Plan of Care to Prevent Future Falls measure is different from the systematic sample used for the LTSS Comprehensive Assessment and Update, LTSS Comprehensive Care Plan and Update, LTSS Shared Care Plan with Primary Care Practitioner, and Part 1 of the Screening, Risk Assessment, and Plan of Care to Prevent Future Falls measures. Members included in the sample for Part 2 of this measure must have a documented history of falls (at least two falls or one fall with injury in the past year), including documentation of plan member self-reported history of falls.

FAQ ID:89001

SHARE URL

If a state submits a state plan amendment (SPA) to reduce payment rates for durable medical equipment (DME) to avoid a reduction of federal financial participation (FFP) under 1903(i)(27), would a state still be required to conduct and submit an annual DME demonstration of state expenditures?

It depends on the individual state plan amendment, but if a state submitted a state plan amendment to cover the relevant DME at or below what Medicare would pay for the same items and that was effective January 1, 2018, then a state would be considered to have demonstrated compliance with the statute and be exempt from submitting a DME FFP limit demonstration. If the state does not currently use Medicare’s payment rates (or a lesser percentage thereof) to reimburse providers for DME, the state may submit a SPA to alter its DME reimbursement methodology to set rates at or below the applicable Medicare rates. If there are competitive bidding areas (CBAs) in the state as defined by Medicare, it may choose to either pay the competitive bidding single payment amount for DME in the applicable CBA of the state under the Medicare program, or could set the statewide plan rate at the lesser of the durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics and supplies fee schedule rate, including rural and non-rural areas as defined by Medicare, or the competitive bid single payment amount under the Medicare CBA for the item. States should be aware that if a SPA is submitted to align Medicaid payment rates to Medicare and is effective after January 1, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) will require the submission of a demonstration for the year in which a SPA is submitted to ensure compliance with the statute for a full calendar year. Once payment rates are set at Medicare rates for a full calendar year, CMS will consider the state as being compliant with the statute through the state plan.

FAQ ID:93551

SHARE URL

Will public notice be required for state plan amendments (SPAs) that are submitted to comply with the statute or is this methodology change exempt?

In general, public notice is required for any changes in statewide methods and standards for setting payment rates as described in 42 CFR 447.205. Public notice must be published one day prior to the effective date of the SPA. If there are specific questions about this policy, please contact the Medicaid durable medical equipment team by email at: MedicaidDME@cms.hhs.gov.

FAQ ID:93556

SHARE URL

Can a state be exempt from the durable medical equipment (DME) federal financial participation (FFP) limit demonstration if they can show that the state's state plan and/or regulations or statues don't allow payments in excess of the new limit?

A simple statement by a state that its payments for DME will not exceed the FFP limit would not be adequate. The statute establishes a limit on the Secretary’s ability to pay FFP, and we must follow the statutory restrictions. We have discussed two potential approaches that a state might use in the January 4, 2018 letter. Any state that wishes to discuss alternative approaches under the State Medicaid Director Letter should contact the Medicaid DME team with all of the information relevant to their request as early in the year as possible.

FAQ ID:93561

SHARE URL
Results per page