Frequently Asked Questions

The difference between a prospective and retrospective UPL is in the relationship between the UPL demonstration period and the date when the UPL is submitted. For a UPL demonstration period of 7/1/2018 to 6/30/2019, a UPL is considered retrospective when it is submitted on or after the start of the demonstration period (on or after 7/1/2018). Using the same UPL demonstration period (7/1/2018 to 6/30/2019), a UPL is considered prospective if it is submitted prior to 7/1/2018.

FAQ ID:92431

Dental services are not covered under Medicare, which means the state may not compare Medicaid rates for comparable dental services for the Medicare Equivalent of the ACR. The state may calculate a dental ACR in order to make supplemental payments to dental services providers and continue to calculate the Medicare Equivalent of the ACR for other services covered by Medicare. The state should submit two separate ACR demonstrations, one for dental services and one for physician (non-dental) services. This will involve completing two versions of the Office of Management and Budget-approved template. If the same provider provides both physician and dental services the state would differentiate the provider information between the two demonstrations by appending the Medicare Certification Number (Medicare ID) (variable 112) with a letter, such as an -A or a -B. For example, if the Medicare ID was 123456, it would be depicted in the physician ACR as 123456-A and in the dental ACR as 12345-B. If a Medicare Certification Number is not available then the state should append the Medicaid Provider Number.

FAQ ID:92441

Yes, services covered under the state plan rendered during the PE period will qualify for federal match regardless of the ultimate Medicaid eligibility decision. The standards that states can set for hospitals and the findings from reviews of hospital performance relative to those standards are intended to ensure that hospitals are making appropriate PE determinations and following state hospital PE procedures. When problems are identified, states should take corrective action to ensure future compliance with state policies and procedures.

Supplemental Links:

• This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 151.09 KB)

FAQ ID:92111

No, CMS does not require any particular starting point within the fiscal year for the UPL demonstrations. This allows states the flexibility to develop UPL demonstrations that are tied to the provider payment periods described in the state plan payment methodologies for each service. For instance, if a state submits a state plan amendment to update provider payments as of October 1 of each year, the state would document that the SPA changes comply with the UPL for the period 10/1 - 9/30 of that payment year. The UPL must represent the entire payment year. Since UPL demonstrations usually rely on historic data that is projected into a payment year, this is consistent with past practices.

FAQ ID:92226

States are requested to submit their UPL demonstrations to the UPL mailbox at MedicaidUPL@cms.hhs.gov, but should also send a copy of each demonstration to their CMS Regional Office, including the National Institutional Reimbursement Team (NIRT) and Non-Institutional Payment Team (NIPT) staff as appropriate, and addressed to the Associate Regional Administrator. UPL demonstrations should be submitted to meet the annual reporting requirement described in SMDL 13-003, as well as when proposing changes in payment through SPAs.

FAQ ID:92251

Yes, in order to ensure that hospitals comply with the agreement to make presumptive eligibility determinations consistent with state policies and procedures, states have the flexibility to require hospitals to have the staff that will do PE determinations take and pass knowledge tests in order to make PE determinations. Since the PE enrollment process does not require detailed knowledge of Medicaid eligibility policy, the test should be appropriately geared to the information needed to make an appropriate decision and comply with state procedures.

Supplemental Links:

• This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 151.09 KB)

FAQ ID:91691

The use of the two performance metrics CMS described in the final rule at section 435.1110 (the proportion of individuals determined PE who submit a full application and the proportion of those who submit an application who are deemed to be Medicaid eligible) is optional for states. States may choose to use other or additional metrics in their hospital PE programs. All states should collect data on hospital performance to fulfill their oversight responsibilities.

Supplemental Links:

• This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 151.09 KB)

FAQ ID:91696

States are considering a number of different types of performance standards, including the proportion of hospital PE determinations made in an outpatient setting (given that a strong incentive exists for determinations in inpatient settings but it is desirable to also implement PE for outpatients to ensure reaching as broad a population as possible) and the number of hospital PE applications completed in one month. Other states are collecting baseline data in order to measure hospital performance and plan to establish specific standards at a later point.

Supplemental Links:

• This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 151.09 KB)

FAQ ID:91701

While individuals may be determined "presumptively eligible" for coverage under the new adult group by a qualified hospital or qualified entity, the newly eligible FMAP is only available once the full eligibility determination has been completed. In these circumstances, the newly eligible FMAP is only authorized with respect to individuals determined eligible for the new adult group by the state agency or other public entity authorized to make final Medicaid eligibility determinations. The regular FMAP applies until such time as the state (or other authorized entity) determines an individual to be eligible for the new adult group and the state confirms that they also meet the definition of a "newly eligible individual."

As noted in our August 2013 FAQs, in appropriate circumstances, a state may retroactively adjust claiming for services provided during a presumptive eligibility period. Specifically, newly eligible status is available based on the effective date of eligibility for the new adult group, which may be as early as the third month prior to the month that the individual applied for Medicaid in accordance with 42 CFR section 435.914 (re-designated at section 435.915 under the March 2012 final eligibility rule), provided that the individual would have been eligible for Medicaid had he or she applied as of the earlier date. To the extent to which the presumptive eligibility period is encompassed within such retroactive eligibility period and the state determines that the individual meets the criteria for newly eligible status, the state may retroactively adjust claiming for services provided during a presumptive eligibility period. The state is not required to make such a retroactive adjustment if the state determines that an adjustment would be administratively burdensome.

Supplemental Links:

• This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 151.09 KB)

FAQ ID:91706

There is no recoupment for Medicaid services provided during a PE period resulting from erroneous determinations made by qualified entities. Payment for services covered under the state plan (as well as federal financial participation) is guaranteed during a PE period; without such a guarantee, providers could not rely on the PE determination. As noted, states have various ways to ensure that hospitals are making appropriate PE determinations and must fulfill their oversight responsibilities.

Supplemental Links:

• This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 151.09 KB) 

FAQ ID:91711