Frequently Asked Questions

At a minimum, states must implement hospital PE to ensure that hospitals are able to make PE determinations for all of the populations included in section 435.1102 and section 435.1103 (that is, all MAGI-eligible groups: pregnant women, infants, and children, parents and caretaker relatives, the adult group, if covered by the state, individuals above 133 percent of the Federal Poverty Level under age 65, if covered by the state, individuals eligible for family planning services, if covered by the state, former foster care children, and certain individuals needing treatment for breast or cervical cancer, if covered by the state). States may allow hospitals to determine PE for other groups, such as the aged, blind, and disabled, and those whose eligibility is established by section 1115 waiver authority. States permitting hospital PE for other groups are responsible for providing information on relevant state policies and procedures and information on how hospitals should fulfill their responsibilities in making presumptive eligibility determinations for such individuals.

Supplemental Links:

• This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 151.09 KB)

FAQ ID:91606

The hospital PE provision in the Affordable Care Act is just for Medicaid state plan and 1115 groups and does not apply to separate CHIP state plan or CHIP 1115 groups. However, hospitals can determine PE for CHIP if a state designates a hospital as a qualified entity under CHIP authorities. A state that covers children and pregnant women in a separate CHIP may elect to have certain qualified entities determine PE for them, and the state determines what types of entities may be qualified entities, which may include hospitals.

Supplemental Links:

• This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 151.09 KB)

FAQ ID:91616

Yes, hospital PE is not limited to patients of the hospital. Hospitals can assist with PE determinations for family members and may also enroll eligible individuals from the broader community.

Supplemental Links:

• This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 151.09 KB) 

FAQ ID:91626

Per our regulations at 42 CFR 435.1103(a), pregnant women may have one PE period per pregnancy. If a woman is pregnant more than once in a calendar year, they may have more than one PE period in a calendar year due to the multiple pregnancies.

Supplemental Links:

• This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 151.09 KB)

FAQ ID:91631

In general, for individuals determined eligible under hospital PE, the benefits provided are the same as those provided under the eligibility group for which PE is determined. See 42 CFR 435.1103(a) and (c)(1)(ii), which specifies that covered benefits for pregnant women during a PE period are limited to ambulatory prenatal care, and benefits covered under family planning PE are limited to family planning services.

Supplemental Links:

• This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 151.09 KB)

FAQ ID:91641

If a state has elected to provide PE for individuals with breast or cervical cancer under section 435.1103(c)(2), it can limit qualified entities under that section to providers who conduct screenings for breast and cervical cancer under the state's CDC BCCEDP, and if it has done so, the state may limit hospitals that may determine PE for individuals with breast or cervical cancer on that basis to hospitals that conduct screenings under the state's BCCEDP. In states that do not opt to provide PE for individuals with breast or cervical cancer under section 435.1103(c), states similarly may limit hospitals' ability to determine PE for individuals with breast or cervical cancer under section 435.1110 to those that conduct screenings under the state' BCCEDP.

Supplemental Links:

• This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 151.09 KB)

FAQ ID:91651

When hospitals determine PE, they are subject to the same general rules set out for other qualified entities that may determine PE, including that they cannot "delegate the authority to determine presumptive eligibility to another entity." (See 42 CFR 435.1102(b)(2)(vi). However, they may implement PE with the support of third party contractors. For example, hospitals can rely on third party contractors to help staff their in-hospital PE operations, by staffing welcome desks, meeting with consumers, and helping them fill out PE applications as long as the hospital takes responsibility for the PE determinations that result. In addition, the regulations at 42 CFR 435.1102(b)(2)(vi) do not limit the ability of third party contractors to assist individuals in completing and submitting the full application.

Hospitals that conduct off-site, targeted outreach may also employ third party contractors to reach out to individuals who may be Medicaid eligible and assist them with a presumptive application and the single streamlined application at the individual's request. Hospitals must oversee such off-site outreach to ensure hospital accountability for the PE determinations, including hospital review and approval of the PE recommendations made by non-hospital employees. States should not unduly limit a hospital's ability to rely on third-party contractors as long as the hospital is not delegating its authority to determine presumptive eligibility to a third party and is meeting appropriate state-established performance standards.

Supplemental Links:

• This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 151.09 KB) 

FAQ ID:91656

Keeping track of all eligible providers is important to ensure ongoing training and that the providers have regular updates in policy as well as to review performance, implement performance standards and develop quality assurance measures. Some states maintain a centralized list of all providers who have completed the process for learning the state's policies and procedures; the state may wish, for example, to periodically review the list by calling all identified providers or settings and asking whether or not listed individuals are currently conducting PE determinations. It is important for states to ensure, over time, that hospital PE is functioning throughout the state.

Supplemental Links:

• This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 151.09 KB)

FAQ ID:91671

States have used a number of strategies to engage hospitals, such as reaching out to the state hospital association or local hospital groups, sending hospitals a letter of interest to get feedback on their plans to participate in the program, and inviting hospital representatives to teleconferences and webinars about the policy. CMS has also reached out to various hospital associations to advise them of this new provision and the federal guidance supporting it.

Supplemental Links:

• This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 151.09 KB)

FAQ ID:91681

Within the parameters set by State Medicaid Director (SMD) Letter #11-004 and SMD Letter #10-016, states may request 90/10 HITECH administrative funding for a wide range of HIE activities that support meaningful use.

States may request this funding for two broad categories of their administrative activities related to HIEs: (1) on-boarding, and (2) design, development, and implementation (DDI) of infrastructure. In this context, on-boarding refers to the state's or HIE's activities related to connecting a provider to an HIE so that the provider is able to successfully exchange data and use the HIE's services; this funding cannot cover costs incurred by the provider or the vendor. For more information, please see the later FAQ that specifically discusses on-boarding. With respect to infrastructure DDI, CMS is able to provide matching funds for a variety of state activities that will enable providers who are eligible for the Medicaid EHR Incentive Program to meet meaningful use. If the requirements of SMD Letters #10-016 and #11-004 are met, CMS will provide funding for state administrative activities related to core HIE services (for example, designing and developing a provider directory, privacy and security applications, and/or data warehouses), public health infrastructure, and electronic Clinical Quality Measurement (eCQM) infrastructure.

CMS recognizes that there are multiple types of HIE models emerging among the states, and will review each proposal individually. SMD Letter #11-004 outlines some of the characteristics that CMS encourages, but a state may provide justification for why an alternate model is more appropriate given the unique circumstances in that state. CMS encourages interested states to reach out to their CMS regional HITECH contacts to discuss any proposed HIE funding requests prior to submitting an Implementation Advance Planning Document Update (IAPD-U) for HIE funding. Please note that cost allocation and fair share principles are critical requirements outlined in SMD Letter #11-004, and so the state must ensure that its funding request complies with the principles outlined in the SMD letter.

Supplemental Links:

• This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 288.05 KB)

FAQ ID:92526