Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, CMS will support the costs for this kind of MMIS transition. We encourage states to ensure that both the current vendor's and new solutions provider's contracts account for this transition period and address a prorating of cost during this time. States should minimize the costs of transition by performing due diligence on the anticipated spending. The legacy system provider should be compensated for its role in ensuring a smooth transition, with a ramp-down of other operational costs. The new solutions provider should have deliverables in its contract that speak to the soft launch or phased launch approach, with an uptick in operational costs as the transition progresses.

FAQ ID:94906

State Medicaid agencies are required to have MMIS System Security Plan and Privacy Impact Assessment documents. State Medicaid agencies must perform regular routine security and privacy risk assessments to ensure the protection and safeguard of beneficiary data that is consistent with Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) privacy and security rules. Please refer to the MECT for more details: https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/data-and-systems/mect/index.html

FAQ ID:94911

Yes. While CMS envisions a discrete role for the System Integrator (SI) in each state, with specific focus on ensuring the integrity and interoperability of the Medicaid IT architecture and coherence of the various modules incorporated into the Medicaid system complex, it is permissible for an SI to provide modules as part of the overall solution. The target outcome for the SI in support of the state should be to foster best-in-breed solutions for Medicaid business requirements, with the SI responsible for the successful integration of the chosen solutions and infrastructure into a seamless functional system. The SI must ensure that all modules have open APIs and remain loosely coupled. More information on the SI role can be found in Section 1.7 of the Medicaid Enterprise Certification Life Cycle, part 01 of the MECT. States are encouraged to use an acquisition approach that limits the potential for conflict of interest an SI may have in choosing the modular solutions to be incorporated into the system. As described above, the goal is to avoid lock-in to a single vendor or an otherwise closed set of solutions.

FAQ ID:94916

CMS encourages the use of an SI outside the state agency, but states can consider themselves in that role if they can support that effort and if that decision is made with consultation and agreement from CMS. For more information about the role of the SI, see Section 1.7 in part 01 of MECT Medicaid Enterprise Certification Life Cycle. https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/data-and-systems/mect/index.html

FAQ ID:94921

Yes. The certification checklist defines a set of business and technical requirements that a particular Medicaid function must meet. The checklists and criteria are agnostic as to whether the requirements are met by a system built within the Medicaid Agency, a Software-as-a-Service model, a cloud-hosted model, or an ASO model.

FAQ ID:94461

Yes, our milestone review process is fully aligned with MITA. During each milestone review, CMS will verify that the state has considered MITA maturity during system definition, and whether the state is actively moving toward higher MITA maturity as defined in the state's latest MITA State Self-Assessment. Please see 42 CFR 433.112 (b)(11).

FAQ ID:94476

CMS is looking for new innovators in the Medicaid IT space. Please direct inquiries to: mmis_mes_certification@cms.hhs.gov.

FAQ ID:94416

Please work with your state representatives, so that they can contact CMS regional offices for quick assistance with your questions. In addition, please review other FAQs related to this topic.

FAQ ID:94431

In qualifying states, certain United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) grade A or B preventive services and vaccine administration codes are eligible for a one percent FMAP increase under section 4106 of the Affordable Care Act (which amended sections 1902(a)(13) and 1905(b) of the Act). Some of these services may also qualify as a primary care services eligible for an increase in the payment rates under section 1202 of the Affordable Care Act. For these services the federal matching rate is 100 percent for the difference between the Medicaid rate as of July 1, 2009 and the payment made pursuant to section 1202 (the increase). The federal matching payment for the portion of the rate related to the July 1, 2009 base payment would be the regular Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP) rate, except that this rate would be increased by one percent if the provisions of section 4106 of the Affordable Care Act are applicable.

Supplemental Links:

• This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set.

FAQ ID:91076

Effective for dates of service on and after January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2014, states are required by law to reimburse qualified providers at the rate that would be paid for the service (if the service were covered) under Medicare. Most states and the District of Columbia will need to submit a Medicaid state plan amendment (SPA) to increase Medicaid rates up to this level. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has issued a state plan amendment (SPA) preprint for the purpose of expediting review and approval of the primary care payment increase.

For dates of service starting January 1, 2013 qualified providers are entitled to receive the higher payment in accordance with the approved Medicaid state plan amendment. States may not have attestation procedures or higher fee schedule rates in place on January 1, 2013. In that event, providers will likely continue to be reimbursed the 2012 rates for a limited period of time. Once attestation procedures are in place and providers are identified as eligible for higher payment, the state will make one or more supplemental payments to ensure that providers receive payment for the difference between the amount paid and the Medicare rate. Qualified providers should receive the total due to them under the provision in a timely manner.

A state may draw federal financial participation for the higher payments only after the SPA methodology is approved.

Supplemental Links:

• This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set.

FAQ ID:91271