Frequently Asked Questions

In accordance with Medicare cost reporting, the state must use 12 months of cost data reported by each facility. With regard to payment data, the state should use actual amounts, to the extent available, then calculate a claims completion factor based on historic utilization. The state’s UPL submission must include an explanation of its methodology to estimate payments. The use of a claims completion factor provides a reasonable estimate of the amount that Medicare would pay for these services, consistent with the UPL as defined at 42 CFR 447.272.

FAQ ID:92446

Yes. Mapping data, through V-Look-ups, for example, is a much easier and consistent process for current and future UPL submissions. However, a state may choose to type information and data into unlocked fields in the UPL templates. When a state chooses to input data directly (not through a V-Look-up) into the template, it still must provide the supporting documentation with the source data. Additionally, the state should explain how it mapped data from the supporting documentation into the template. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services utilizes the supporting information to confirm that the information in the templates is correct.

FAQ ID:92451

State Medicaid Director Letter #17-004 addressed this area by stating: “Reductions necessary to implement CMS federal Medicaid payment requirements (e.g., federal upper payment limits and financial participation limits), but only in circumstances under which the state is not exercising discretion as to how the requirement is implemented in rates. For example, if the federal statute or regulation imposes an aggregate upper payment limit that requires the state to reduce provider payments, the state should consider the impact of the payment reduction on access.” In addition, the long-standing policy of the Medicaid program has been that Medicare rates are sufficient to ensure access.

FAQ ID:93521

We acknowledge that there are differences between the Medicare and Medicaid populations, but nothing in the policy guidance or statute compels states to reduce the items that states provide to people with disabilities under the state plan. As noted above, the statute does not expressly compel states to reduce the payment rates for DME. The statute limits the amount of money that the federal government will pay (i.e., FFP) for the relevant DME in the aggregate as compared with the relevant DME provided in the Medicare program. States retain the flexibility to make payments at rates that best serve the needs of their Medicaid beneficiaries.

FAQ ID:93526

Yes, services covered under the state plan rendered during the PE period will qualify for federal match regardless of the ultimate Medicaid eligibility decision. The standards that states can set for hospitals and the findings from reviews of hospital performance relative to those standards are intended to ensure that hospitals are making appropriate PE determinations and following state hospital PE procedures. When problems are identified, states should take corrective action to ensure future compliance with state policies and procedures.

Supplemental Links:

• This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 151.09 KB)

FAQ ID:92111

The state should complete one template each for the DRG and per diem UPL calculations and these should be placed in one file. The state should also include a summary worksheet in the same file that shows the UPL gap for each ownership category (state government owned, non-state government owned, and private). States should include all necessary supporting documentation.

FAQ ID:92276

Yes, in order to ensure that hospitals comply with the agreement to make presumptive eligibility determinations consistent with state policies and procedures, states have the flexibility to require hospitals to have the staff that will do PE determinations take and pass knowledge tests in order to make PE determinations. Since the PE enrollment process does not require detailed knowledge of Medicaid eligibility policy, the test should be appropriately geared to the information needed to make an appropriate decision and comply with state procedures.

Supplemental Links:

• This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 151.09 KB)

FAQ ID:91691

The use of the two performance metrics CMS described in the final rule at section 435.1110 (the proportion of individuals determined PE who submit a full application and the proportion of those who submit an application who are deemed to be Medicaid eligible) is optional for states. States may choose to use other or additional metrics in their hospital PE programs. All states should collect data on hospital performance to fulfill their oversight responsibilities.

Supplemental Links:

• This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 151.09 KB)

FAQ ID:91696

States are considering a number of different types of performance standards, including the proportion of hospital PE determinations made in an outpatient setting (given that a strong incentive exists for determinations in inpatient settings but it is desirable to also implement PE for outpatients to ensure reaching as broad a population as possible) and the number of hospital PE applications completed in one month. Other states are collecting baseline data in order to measure hospital performance and plan to establish specific standards at a later point.

Supplemental Links:

• This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 151.09 KB)

FAQ ID:91701

While individuals may be determined "presumptively eligible" for coverage under the new adult group by a qualified hospital or qualified entity, the newly eligible FMAP is only available once the full eligibility determination has been completed. In these circumstances, the newly eligible FMAP is only authorized with respect to individuals determined eligible for the new adult group by the state agency or other public entity authorized to make final Medicaid eligibility determinations. The regular FMAP applies until such time as the state (or other authorized entity) determines an individual to be eligible for the new adult group and the state confirms that they also meet the definition of a "newly eligible individual."

As noted in our August 2013 FAQs, in appropriate circumstances, a state may retroactively adjust claiming for services provided during a presumptive eligibility period. Specifically, newly eligible status is available based on the effective date of eligibility for the new adult group, which may be as early as the third month prior to the month that the individual applied for Medicaid in accordance with 42 CFR section 435.914 (re-designated at section 435.915 under the March 2012 final eligibility rule), provided that the individual would have been eligible for Medicaid had he or she applied as of the earlier date. To the extent to which the presumptive eligibility period is encompassed within such retroactive eligibility period and the state determines that the individual meets the criteria for newly eligible status, the state may retroactively adjust claiming for services provided during a presumptive eligibility period. The state is not required to make such a retroactive adjustment if the state determines that an adjustment would be administratively burdensome.

Supplemental Links:

• This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 151.09 KB)

FAQ ID:91706