Frequently Asked Questions are used to provide additional information and/or statutory guidance not found in State Medicaid Director Letters, State Health Official Letters, or CMCS Informational Bulletins. The different sets of FAQs as originally released can be accessed below.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can hospitals rely on third party contractors to provide support in administering presumptive eligibility (PE)?
When hospitals determine PE, they are subject to the same general rules set out for other qualified entities that may determine PE, including that they cannot "delegate the authority to determine presumptive eligibility to another entity." (See 42 CFR 435.1102(b)(2)(vi). However, they may implement PE with the support of third party contractors. For example, hospitals can rely on third party contractors to help staff their in-hospital PE operations, by staffing welcome desks, meeting with consumers, and helping them fill out PE applications as long as the hospital takes responsibility for the PE determinations that result. In addition, the regulations at 42 CFR 435.1102(b)(2)(vi) do not limit the ability of third party contractors to assist individuals in completing and submitting the full application.
Hospitals that conduct off-site, targeted outreach may also employ third party contractors to reach out to individuals who may be Medicaid eligible and assist them with a presumptive application and the single streamlined application at the individual's request. Hospitals must oversee such off-site outreach to ensure hospital accountability for the PE determinations, including hospital review and approval of the PE recommendations made by non-hospital employees. States should not unduly limit a hospital's ability to rely on third-party contractors as long as the hospital is not delegating its authority to determine presumptive eligibility to a third party and is meeting appropriate state-established performance standards.
Supplemental Links:
- This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 151.09 KB)Â
FAQ ID:91656
SHARE URLHow can states keep track of all active PE providers?
Keeping track of all eligible providers is important to ensure ongoing training and that the providers have regular updates in policy as well as to review performance, implement performance standards and develop quality assurance measures. Some states maintain a centralized list of all providers who have completed the process for learning the state's policies and procedures; the state may wish, for example, to periodically review the list by calling all identified providers or settings and asking whether or not listed individuals are currently conducting PE determinations. It is important for states to ensure, over time, that hospital PE is functioning throughout the state.
Supplemental Links:
- This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 151.09 KB)
FAQ ID:91671
SHARE URLHow can states engage hospitals on the issue of hospital PE - either to encourage participation or simply to gauge interest?
States have used a number of strategies to engage hospitals, such as reaching out to the state hospital association or local hospital groups, sending hospitals a letter of interest to get feedback on their plans to participate in the program, and inviting hospital representatives to teleconferences and webinars about the policy. CMS has also reached out to various hospital associations to advise them of this new provision and the federal guidance supporting it.
Supplemental Links:
- This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 151.09 KB)
FAQ ID:91681
SHARE URLUnder CMS 2370-F, may practice managers or billing staff of large group practices and health systems attest on behalf of their physicians on the basis of information on board certification in the records of the practice or health system?
If these practices and health systems maintain the types of documentation described in the previous answer, FAQ45736, with respect to managed care organizations, attestation by the group or system would be acceptable. As previously noted, a physician actually must be practicing as an internist, pediatrician or family physician in order to be eligible for higher payment. Board certification does not always equate to practice characteristics. Therefore, attestation on the basis of information on board certification alone would not suffice.
Supplemental Links:
FAQ ID:93866
SHARE URLUnder CMS 2370-F, if a physician renders services in both the managed care and fee for service environments, must he or she self-attest to eligibility twice?
No. The attestation and eligibility are physician-specific. If a physician provides services both in a fee-for-service and managed care environment, they need only complete the process of attestation once in order to receive higher payment for all eligible services they provide. CMS expects all information on self-attestation to be fully available to the state, regardless of which party collected this information.
Supplemental Links:
FAQ ID:93871
SHARE URLUnder CMS 2370, may physicians who practice in two (or more) states meet the 60 percent threshold based on all services provided in all states, or must they qualify on the basis of the services they provide in each state?
States have the flexibility to count eligible services provided by a physician in neighboring states in meeting the 60 percent threshold, but are not required to do so.
Supplemental Links:
FAQ ID:93876
SHARE URLThere are at least two current procedural terminology (CPT) codes (99429 and 99499) for which there are no relative value units (RVU) and the state manually prices the services for purposes of Medicaid payment. Will CMS develop a Medicare-like rate for these codes under the CMS 2370-F rule?
These services would not be subject to the minimum payment standard set in the rule because there are no RVUs and there is no conversion factor associated with them. Therefore, a Medicare-like rate cannot be developed. The state may continue to reimburse them at the current Medicaid rate but enhanced federal financial participation (FFP) will not be available for those services.
Supplemental Links:
FAQ ID:93881
SHARE URLUnder CMS 2370-F, if a physician self-attests to being a primary care provider and supports that attestation with evidence of appropriate board certification, must we review that physician's practice to verify that they actually practice in that manner?
No. Verification of current board certification is sufficient.
Supplemental Links:
FAQ ID:93886
SHARE URLUnder CMS 2370-F, if a physician is board certified in a non-eligible specialty (for example dermatology) but practices within the community as for, example, a family practitioner and attests to meeting the 60 percent claims threshold, are we expected to audit his or her practice and, if so, how? May we be specific about our audit requirements in the state plan?
Since the only evidence of eligibility is the self-attestation and claims history, the state would need to take steps to verify the practice characteristics of the physician. This could be done by determining that the physician represents himself in the community as a family practitioner, as evidenced by medical directory listings, billings to other insurers, advertisements, etc.
While we have no objection to the addition of this information to the state plan amendment (SPA), we believe it is more important that the state make providers aware of the audit procedures and requirements as part of the enrollment process.
Supplemental Links:
FAQ ID:93891
SHARE URLUnder CMS 2370-F, there are several codes for which there are relative value units (RVUs), but a rate does not calculate for the non-facility setting. For example, 99217-99221 (observation codes) only have a facility fee. If the state is electing the option of paying the non-facility fee, should it use the facility fee or is there an alternative method for calculation?
When there are RVUs for just one site of service the state should use those RVUs. There is no alternate method for calculation.
Supplemental Links:
FAQ ID:93896
SHARE URL
Results per page