U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Frequently Asked Questions

Frequently Asked Questions are used to provide additional information and/or statutory guidance not found in State Medicaid Director Letters, State Health Official Letters, or CMCS Informational Bulletins. The different sets of FAQs as originally released can be accessed below.

Showing 1 to 10 of 42 results

Are there any Federal laws that restrict charter and/or private schools from engaging in a RMTS for the purpose of administrative and/or direct service claiming?

As stated on page 44 of the 2023 Comprehensive Guide to Medicaid Services and Administrative Claiming, if public charter schools are funded predominantly by State and local funds, including local tax revenue or appropriations, similar to other governmental entities, they may be eligible to provide the non-federal share of Medicaid or CHIP expenditures through CPEs.

However, other school entities that are not units of State or local government, including private schools, would not be considered governmental entities under 42 CF.R. § 433.51(b) and § 457.220. Direct payments to private or non-governmental educational institutions for Medicaid and CHIP SBS are available but are typically funded by State appropriations to the Medicaid/CHIP agency. Private and other non-governmental school entities may not participate directly in a CPE. However, an LEA that is a unit of government can contract with providers to provide eligible Medicaid/CHIP services to children in private entities, and CPE the contracted costs, as long as the arrangement adheres to the requirements discussed on page 43 in the 2023 Comprehensive Guide to Medicaid Services and Administrative Claiming.

In addition to a cost methodology, LEAs that are units of government may also transfer the non-federal share funds via intergovernmental transfers (IGTs) to the SMA for services provided in private schools as long as the provider receives and retains the entire Medicaid payment described in the Medicaid State plan.

FAQ ID:162341

SHARE URL

What is a Random Moment Time Study?

Per 45 C.F.R. § 75.430(i)(5), a Random Moment Time Study (RMTS) is a type of “substitute system” used for determining and documenting time spent on, and therefore the costs of, Medicaid administrative and direct service activities. Per page 108 of the 2023 Comprehensive Guide to Medicaid Services and Administrative Claiming, a RMTS is a statistically valid sampling methodology that can be used by States and LEAs to determine how much time eligible staff spend performing Medicaid reimbursable work activities. The RMTS is used to determine a statistic that is applied to salary and fringe benefits for qualified providers and reported on a cost report for direct medical services. A RMTS is generally used in an allocation of a cost pool to allowable medical, administrative (if applicable), and unallowable moments that is further allocated to Medicaid using a Medicaid Eligibility Ratio (MER). The RMTS and supporting documents become part of the documentation for the claim. The RMTS is used to determine a statistic that is applied to salary and fringe benefits for qualified providers and to other payable costs that are reported on a cost report for direct medical services.

A RMTS must reflect all of the time and activities (whether allowable or unallowable under Medicaid) performed by school employees. The RMTS sample universe (or Participant List) should include all staff who potentially perform Medicaid direct services or administrative activities. LEAs should consider both job title and job function when determining which individual staff members should be included in which cost pool.

FAQ ID:162291

SHARE URL

CMS has communicated a recommendation for a 15 percent oversampling. Is this intended to become standard practice, or is it to be regarded as a suggestion?

CMS’ longstanding standard policy has been to recommend a 15 percent oversampling for RMTS to ensure a valid response rate of at least 85 percent or include all nonresponses as non-Medicaid and unallowable.

In general, all completed responses should be used in an RMTS. However, CMS allows for the use of an alternate methodology in cases where the TSIP specifies an oversample to ensure an adequate number of valid responses for the treatment of time study nonresponses are achieved. The alternate methodology CMS historically has approved uses an 85 percent valid response rate. CMS recommends an oversample of 15 percent to ensure an adequate number of valid responses are received and to meet the required precision level. Per page 113 of the 2023 Comprehensive Guide to Medicaid Services and Administrative Claiming, an oversample may be used only to compensate, not substitute, for the potential number of nonresponses.

FAQ ID:162346

SHARE URL

The 2023 Comprehensive Guide to Medicaid Services and Administrative Claiming encourages States to use a zero-notice approach and indicates that CMS may recognize up to two days prior notice, as appropriate to the circumstances. The guide also indicates that CMS recognizes that, in certain circumstances, no prior notification will result in a significant non-response rate. For example, in some rural areas where internet access is weak, under a zero-notice policy, participants may not be informed of their moment until after the moment has occurred. What is CMS’s policy regarding time study notification and response time?

CMS’s general standard regarding time study notification and response time is up to two-day upfront notification and up to a two-day response period. CMS is also willing to work with States that are not immediately able to meet these standards to work out a plan to eventually get to no more than a two-day upfront notification and a two-day response period. If a State believes that up to two days prior notice and two days response is not achievable, the State can propose an alternative to CMS and provide its rationale. CMS will consider additional time for prior notification and/or response time upon request from a State in such circumstances.

FAQ ID:162361

SHARE URL

If a State has already implemented the +/-5 percent overall error rate, is there a requirement to submit any documentation to CMS for review and/or approval?

No, if your State's CMS-approved TSIP already adheres to the 2023 Comprehensive Guide to Medicaid Services and Administrative Claiming on page 112, then the State does not need to amend its TSIP for error rates. We do recommend States look closely at their previously approved Time Study methodology to ensure full compliance with all applicable Federal requirements as discussed in the 2023 Comprehensive Guide to Medicaid Services and Administrative Claiming.

FAQ ID:162366

SHARE URL

What should a LEA do if nonresponses in a RMTS are greater than 15%?

If the valid response rate is above 85 percent, nonresponses may be discarded and not included in the time study results. However, if the valid response rate is below 85 percent, regardless of the 15 percent oversample, CMS has required all non-responses to be included and coded as non-Medicaid.

FAQ ID:162351

SHARE URL

Is the use of Random Moment Time Studies (RMTS) mandatory for administrative claiming, or do States have the option to employ a different allocation methodology to identify time or cost applicable to medical and/or administrative activities?

No, while an RMTS is typically used to identify and allocate cost, it is not the only option. States also have the flexibility to utilize an alternative methodology for reimbursement and/or allocation, provided there is appropriate documentation for CMS review of the chosen methodology. Regulations on personnel expenses in 45 C.F.R. § 75.430(i) require that charges to federal awards must be based on records that reflect the actual work performed. The records must:

  • be supported by a system of internal controls that provides reasonable assurance charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated,
  • reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated,
  • encompass both federally assisted and all other activities for which the employee is compensated, and
  • support the distribution of the employee's salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives.

FAQ ID:162316

SHARE URL

When is it more appropriate to contact my State Medicaid or Education agency instead of the TAC?

The TAC welcomes all inquiries related to Medicaid School-Based Services in our mailbox at SchoolBasedServices@cms.hhs.gov. We will provide all the technical assistance we can and will advise contacting the State Medicaid or Education agency if further guidance is needed due to State-specific regulations.

FAQ ID:162281

SHARE URL

Where can I find an application to apply for the Medicare Savings Program (MSP)?

The Medicare Savings Program (MSP) Model application can be found here: Medicare Savings Programs (MSP) Model Application for Medicare Premium Assistance

FAQ ID:95161

SHARE URL

How can residential and adult day settings comply with the HCBS settings requirements while serving Medicaid beneficiaries who may wander or exit-seek unsafely?

Many Medicaid beneficiaries living with dementia and other conditions can have a heightened risk of wandering, or attempting to leave a setting (exit-seeking) unsafely. These behaviors are not necessarily constant or permanent.

Wandering occurs in ways that may appear aimless but often have purpose. People may wander simply because they want to move. Sometimes wandering responds to an unmet basic need like human contact, hunger, or thirst; a noisy or confusing environment; or because people are experiencing some type of distress, like pain or the need to use the toilet. Wandering can be helpful or dangerous, depending on the situation. Although people who wander may gain social contact, exercise, and stimulation, they can also become lost or exhausted.

Person-centered planning, staff training and care delivery are core components of provider operations to meet HCBS requirements while responding to unsafe wandering and exit-seeking behavior in an individualized manner.3 Person-centered services involve knowing individuals, and their conditions, needs, and history and using this knowledge to create strategies to assure that individuals are free to interact with others and the community in the most integrated way possible and still prevent injury for those who wander or exit-seek unsafely. Home and community-based settings must demonstrate that person-centered planning drives their operations and services for each person. The beneficiaries the settings serve must drive the person-centered planning process with assistance from a trained, competent, assessor, care manager or similar facilitator. The beneficiary should be able to get input from people who are important to him or her, while still reflecting the individual's input as much as possible. Person-centered plans and related decisions should be consistent with the person's needs and preferences, and informed by family members, caregivers, and other individuals that the beneficiary has identified as playing an important role in his or her life. The role of person-centered planning and the process for realizing this role is described in the final HCBS regulation and in guidance found on the Medicaid.gov website.

Person-centered service plans should be developed with the individual, and include their representatives as appropriate. The person-centered planning process should include a process that:

  • is informed by discussions with family members or other individuals who are important to them about key aspects of daily routines and rituals;
  • focuses on an individual's strengths and interests;
  • outlines the individual's reaction to various communication styles;
  • identifies the individual's favorite things to do and experience during the day, as well as experiences that contribute to a bad day;
  • proposes experiences that the person may enjoy as community engagement, and describes those factors or characteristics that the individuals would find most isolating or stigmatizing

To promote effective communication, which is at the core of person-centered planning and service delivery, provider staff serving beneficiaries who wander or exit-seek should receive education and training about how to communicate with individuals living with conditions that may lead to unsafe wandering or exit-seeking. Training programs may include important information on issues such as:

  • The most common types of conditions, diseases and disorders that lead to wandering behavior; the various stages of key conditions that result in increased risk of wandering and what to expect over time; and the potential impact of these conditions on the individual's ability to function.
  • Differentiating between most common types of conditions, diseases and disorders that lead to wandering behavior from serious mental illness or adverse environmental conditions such as overmedication or neglect.
  • Assessing individuals for co-occurring conditions (including barriers to sufficient adaptive skills and the ability to communicate with others) that increase risk for unsafe wandering or exit-seeking.
  • Understanding situations that led to past instances of unsafe wandering or exit-seeking or the desire to engage in them;
  • Principles of person-centered care planning and service delivery;
  • Strategies for identifying and handling behavioral expressions of need or distress.

In addition to previous guidance provided by CMS on the implementation of person-centered planning requirements outlined in the federal HCBS regulations defining home and community-based settings, integration of the following promising practices around person-centered planning specifically for people who wander or exit-seek unsafely is recommended:

  • Assessing the patterns, frequency, and triggers for unsafe wandering or exit-seeking through direct observation and by talking with the person exhibiting such behaviors, and, when appropriate, their families.
  • Using this baseline information to develop a person-centered plan to address unsafe wandering or exit-seeking, implementing the plan, and measuring its impact.
  • Using periodic assessments to update information about an individual's unsafe wandering or exit-seeking, and adjust the person-centered plan as necessary.

Supplemental Links:

FAQ ID:94926

SHARE URL
Results per page