Frequently Asked Questions are used to provide additional information and/or statutory guidance not found in State Medicaid Director Letters, State Health Official Letters, or CMCS Informational Bulletins. The different sets of FAQs as originally released can be accessed below.
Frequently Asked Questions
Yes, the breast and cervical cancer group and the eligibility group for working disabled individuals will remain optional eligibility groups which States may elect. The Affordable Care Act did not alter the financial or non-financial requirements or methodologies used to determine eligibility for these groups, both of which are exempt from the application of Modified Adjusted Gross Income (MAGI) methodology for determining income.
Supplemental Links:
Date: May 21, 2012
Topics:
Affordable Care Act
Subtopics:
Eligibility Policy
FAQ ID: 93151
Coverage under section 1931 of the Act was not repealed with the ACA and will remain in effect in 2014. As noted in the table above, eligibility for parents and caretaker relatives under section 1931 is implemented at section 435.110 of the regulations; eligibility for pregnant women under section 1931 is implemented at section 435.116 and eligibility for children at section 435.118. TMA under section 1925 of the Act will sunset on December 31, 2012, unless extended by Congress. If Congress elects to extend section 1925 of the Act beyond December 31, 2013, States will need to provide TMA to eligible individuals as set forth in their approved State plans. Note that the 4-month extension for individuals losing eligibility under section 1931 of the Act due to increased earnings or hours of work (see sections 1902(e)(1)(A) and 1931(c)(2) of the Act), and the 4-month extension of eligibility for individuals losing eligibility due to increased spousal support (see section 1931(c)(1) of the Act) do not have a sunset date and would therefore still apply in 2014 unless repealed by Congress. The extension of eligibility for individuals losing coverage under section 1931 due to increased child support will no longer be relevant in 2014, as child support is not counted as income under MAGI-based methodologies.
Supplemental Links:
Date: May 21, 2012
Topics:
Affordable Care Act
Subtopics:
Eligibility Policy
FAQ ID: 93156
Yes. People with disabilities or who need long term care services and supports may qualify under the new adult group in 2014 if they meet the MAGI-based eligibility standards for that group. In addition, under the final eligibility and enrollment rule, eligibility for the new adult group based on MAGI does not preclude eligibility for coverage under an optional group that might be otherwise excepted from MAGI methods. Individuals with MAGI-based income up to 133% of the federal poverty level who meet the criteria for the adult group but who need long term services and supports, can choose to enroll in an optional group that better meets their needs, and they can move from the adult group to the optional eligibility group at any time, if eligible. Individuals found eligible for the new adult group based on MAGI, but who appear on the application to be potentially eligible for Medicaid on a basis other than MAGI, will be offered a more thorough eligibility determination so that they can have this option.
Supplemental Links:
Date: May 21, 2012
Topics:
Affordable Care Act
Subtopics:
Eligibility Policy
FAQ ID: 93161
States may continue to provide coverage to medically needy individuals in 2014, and indeed are required to offer such coverage with respect to children until the maintenance of effort requirement provision in section 1902(gg) of the Act expires. States have the option to discontinue coverage under medically needy groups for adults (e.g., disabled individuals with income above the standard for categorical eligibility) in 2014, subject to section 1902(gg). In States that continue to cover existing medically needy adult groups, adults who meet the categorical eligibility and resource requirements will have the ability to spend down to the medically needy income standard and receive the benefits covered for medically needy individuals in the State, or to enroll in the adult group (provided they meet the eligibility requirements for that group, including being under 65 and not eligible for Medicare).
Supplemental Links:
Date: May 21, 2012
Topics:
Affordable Care Act
Subtopics:
Eligibility Policy
FAQ ID: 93166
The final rule specifies that Medicaid and CHIP agencies will establish their verification policies and procedures in a verification plan. This plan is not a required element of the Medicaid State plan but States suggested, and CMS agrees, that it will be helpful to have the each State's eligibility verification process established in a written plan. The verification plans will serve many purposes, including ensuring PERM reviews are mindful of the State's verification policies and also for promoting coordination with the Exchange. States' verification plans will be public and available upon request, but we are not establishing a Federal approval process. State verification policies must of course always be consistent with applicable Federal at section 435.940 - 435.956 of the eligibility final rule.
The verification plans will include information about the data sources the State will use to verify applicant information, define reasonable compatibility standards, and determine when self attestation will be accepted. CMS will provide a verification plan template for States to use.
Supplemental Links:
Date: May 21, 2012
Topics:
Affordable Care Act
Subtopics:
Eligibility Policy
FAQ ID: 93176
Self-attestation is permitted for all factors of eligibility, except as required by law (i.e. citizenship and immigration status). States must accept self-attestation of pregnancy, unless information provided is not reasonably compatible with other information in the State's files.
Supplemental Links:
Date: May 21, 2012
Topics:
Affordable Care Act
Subtopics:
Eligibility Policy
FAQ ID: 93181
Under the Affordable Care Act, an Expansion State is one that had eligibility standards for parents and nonpregnant childless adults (under either the State plan or a demonstration project) to at least 100 percent of the FPL as of the date of enactment of the Affordable Care Act. Specifically, a State is an expansion State if, on March 23, 2010, the State offered health benefits coverage Statewide to parents and non-pregnant, childless adults whose income is at least 100 percent of the poverty line, that includes inpatient hospital services, is not dependent on access to employer coverage, employer contribution, or employment and is not limited to premium assistance, hospital-only benefits, a high deductible health plan, or alternative benefits under a demonstration program authorized under section 1938 of the act. A State that offers health benefits coverage to only parents or only non-pregnant childless adults described in preceding sentence will not be considered to be an expansion State; both groups must have been covered as described above.
The law established a special Federal medical assistance percentage (FMAP) for expansion States. Expansion States are able to claim a special FMAP for the non-pregnant childless adults who are not "newly eligible." These States can also claim the enhanced FMAP for individuals who are "newly eligible" in 2014. CMS is in the process of a 50-State review of State coverage as of March 23, 2010.
Supplemental Links:
Date: May 21, 2012
Topics:
Affordable Care Act
Subtopics:
Newly Eligible and Expansion State Federal Medical Assistance Percentages (FMAP)
FAQ ID: 93191
Yes, in order to be eligible for enhanced FMAP for "newly eligible" individuals, an individual must be in the new adult group. The adult group is comprised of individuals that could include parents. Specifically, the group is comprised of individuals described in section 1902(a)(10)(A)(i)(VIII) of the Act who beginning January 1, 2014:
- Are under age 65
- Are not pregnant
- Not entitled to/enrolled for benefits under Medicare (Part A and B)
- Not described in the "(I) to (VII) Groups" (referring to individuals described in section 1902(a)(10)(I) - (VII) of the Act)
- Whose income is determined using MAGI and does not exceed 133% of the FPL
This list does not preclude parents from being in the adult group, but whether the State can claim enhanced FMAP depends on whether the parents are considered "newly eligible" ; that is, an individual who is not under 19 years of age (or higher age as the State may have elected) and who is not eligible under the State plan or under a waiver of the plan for full benefits or for benchmark coverage or benchmark equivalent coverage under State rules in effect as of December 2009, or is eligible but would not have been enrolled for such benefits or coverage through a waiver under the plan that has a capped or limited enrollment.
Thus, for any parents who are in the adult group because, for example, their income is greater than the income standard for parents in the State's parent/caretaker relative group in January 2014, the State will be able to claim enhanced FMAP if they would not have been eligible under the eligibility criteria in effect under the plan or waiver as of December 1, 2009.
Our proposed rules on this definition were issued in August 2011 (available at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-08-17/html/2011-20756.htm ); final rules are forthcoming. As discussed in the proposed rule, CMS intends to establish a methodology for States to claim enhanced FMAP without having to maintain and apply its December 1, 2009 eligibility rules to each individual.
Supplemental Links:
Date: May 21, 2012
Topics:
Affordable Care Act
Subtopics:
Newly Eligible and Expansion State Federal Medical Assistance Percentages (FMAP)
FAQ ID: 93201
The section 1115 waiver authority continues and whether a particular waiver continues will vary by State. CMS has been working with States individually to determine the appropriate waivers and expenditure authorities that will be extended beyond December 31, 2013. For example, States that have utilized demonstrations to expand eligibility to the childless adult population will no longer need the expenditure authority because this population will become a mandatory State plan population under the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid eligibility expansion. On the other hand, States that have utilized demonstrations to undertake delivery system reforms may still require waivers and/or expenditure authorities to execute those reforms beyond December 31, 2013.
CMS will work with States to develop and submit the transition plans that are required by the Special Terms and Conditions of each demonstration. These transition plans will serve as a vehicle for discussion of the various options that States will have in 2014 and beyond, including for populations with incomes above 133 percent of the Federal poverty level (FPL). CMS will engage with States during State Operations and Technical Assistance (SOTA) calls to work through State-specific transition issues.
Supplemental Links:
Date: May 21, 2012
Topics:
Affordable Care Act
Subtopics:
Section 1115 Demonstrations
FAQ ID: 93016
The SOTA calls cannot replace the submission of a transition plan, as the plan is a required deliverable under the State's Special Terms and Conditions. However, we expect to use the SOTA calls as a platform for transition planning discussions. We are also available for additional calls with States as needed. We can accept as the State's required early deliverable, a summary of the issues that the State needs to address in the transition plan, given the specific features of its waiver and plans for 2014. We will work with States in subsequent months to fully develop the transition plan to ensure it is in place in time for 2014.
Supplemental Links:
Date: May 21, 2012
Topics:
Affordable Care Act
Subtopics:
Section 1115 Demonstrations
FAQ ID: 93026