Frequently Asked Questions are used to provide additional information and/or statutory guidance not found in State Medicaid Director Letters, State Health Official Letters, or CMCS Informational Bulletins. The different sets of FAQs as originally released can be accessed below.
Frequently Asked Questions
The list of services on Medicaid.gov comes from 1905(r)(1)(B) of the Social Security Act, which specifies that screening services provided under EPSDT “shall at a minimum include—
(i) a comprehensive health and developmental history (including assessment of both physical and mental health development),
(ii) a comprehensive unclothed physical exam,
(iii) appropriate immunizations (according to the schedule referred to in section 1928(c)(2)(B)(i) for pediatric vaccines) according to age and health history,
(iv) laboratory tests (including lead blood level assessment appropriate for age and risk factors), and
(v) health education (including anticipatory guidance).”
This list of services is a minimum, not a comprehensive list of services that may be covered under EPSDT. The EPSDT benefit entitles most eligible Medicaid-enrolled children and adolescents to services and treatments that fit within any of the benefit categories of Medicaid-coverable services listed in section 1905(a) of the Social Security Act if medically necessary, as determined by the State, to “correct or ameliorate” identified conditions.
Therefore, schools and other providers may perform and bill for some EPSDT services without providing all of the minimum services listed in 1905(r)(1)(B). EPSDT services include comprehensive examinations, vaccinations, screening for common childhood health conditions, screening and treatment for mental health conditions, and other services.
No, IEP meetings and the initial creation of an IEP should be coded under Code 3. School Related and Educational Activities. Page 134 of the Comprehensive Guide defines Code 3 as including: “Developing, coordinating, and monitoring the IEP for a student, which includes ensuring annual reviews of the IEP are conducted, parental sign-offs are obtained, and the actual IEP meetings with the parents.”
IEP meetings are performed to meet the IDEA statute and regulations, and therefore are educational in nature. When health professionals attend an IEP meeting, the focus of the meeting is on a student’s needs that impact their educational attainment, so these activities continue to be classified as educational. Education is not the same cost center as Medicaid allowable activities and the costs are therefore excluded from Medicaid reimbursement.
However, it is important to note that Medicaid will reimburse for assessments to evaluate the child’s medically necessary treatment needs when performed by a practitioner whose scope of practice includes referrals for treatment.
When conducting medical/health assessments/evaluations as part of the development of an IEP or IFSP, Code 4C. Direct Medical Services – Covered on a Medical Plan of Care, Not Covered as IDEA/ IEP service, is the correct code. Because the services are not due to an IEP, but rather result in an IEP, Code 4C is utilized instead of Code 4B. Code 4C should be used when providing direct medical services when documented on a medical plan other than an IEP/IFSP or where medical necessity has been otherwise established. These direct services may be delivered to an individual and/or group in order to ameliorate a specific condition and are performed in the presence of the student(s).
The State Medicaid Agency determines if medical necessity can be presumptive when services are preventive in nature and targeted at a general population group. Medical necessity criterion is determined by the state in accordance with 42 CFR 440.230(d).
In accordance with 42 CFR 440.230(d), state Medicaid programs may establish appropriate medical necessity criteria and other utilization controls, such as prior authorization, for covered Medicaid services. The State Medicaid agency provides documentation of what can serve as medical necessity for health education and how health education services can be documented as medically necessary.
The 2023 Comprehensive Guide to Medicaid Services and Administrative Claiming defines IDEA/IEP services where direct services may be delivered to an individual and/or group to ameliorate a specific condition and are performed in the presence of the student(s). All direct medical services should be outlined in the Medicaid State Plan and questions about specific classroom-based interventions should be directed to the State Medicaid Agency.
States may choose whether to allow the periodicity schedule as documentation of medical necessity for screening and preventive services. Some states have opted to include language for EPDST services that include using schedules or medical society guidelines to establish EPSDT medical necessity.
There is no federal requirement for a plan of care. However, states may establish requirements for a plan of care in order to prove medical necessity.
The State Medicaid agency or state laws related to consent protocols and procedures would apply. Please consult the relevant state agencies or your organizational legal counsel.
Generally, State Medicaid agencies are required to use the cost avoidance method when probable TPL exists. For services that are not included in a student’s IEP or IFSP under IDEA, schools and school-based providers must meet federal and state Medicaid requirements by billing the third-party health insurance before billing Medicaid to determine the extent of the insurer’s liability. However, when the claim is for medical child support services or preventive pediatric services covered in the Medicaid State Plan, SMAs use the “pay and chase” method instead.
As stated on page 106 of the Comprehensive Guide,
“Using the ‘pay and chase’ method, the State Medicaid agency pays the claims submitted by providers and then seeks reimbursement from the liable third parties. Reimbursement must be sought unless it is determined that recovery of reimbursement would not be cost-effective in accordance with threshold amounts that have been established by the State Medicaid agency.”
If the SMA determines that recovery of third-party reimbursement will not be cost-effective, it can choose to terminate recovery efforts. More information about the termination of recovery efforts can be found at 42 CFR 433.139(f). This regulation specifies that the Medicaid State Plan must include the threshold amount.
“The State plan must specify the threshold amount or other guideline that the agency uses in determining whether to seek recovery of reimbursement from a liable third party or describe the process by which the agency determines that seeking recovery of reimbursement would not be cost-effective.”