Frequently Asked Questions

To exempt services from third party billing requirements, CMS requires the state to have clear and convincing documentation of non-coverage by insurers. There are multiple ways the state may obtain this documentation:

• The state may bill third parties and receive claims rejection notices. However, the state must assure that national billing codes for the items or services are included on claims, or, if local billing codes are used, that national codes and local codes are matched, so that rejection notices accurately reflect non-coverage of the item or service.
• The state may conduct a survey of insurers' benefit packages. The state can demonstrate non-coverage if it confirms with the top ten insurance carriers that their scope of benefits did not cover an item or service. However, since many insurers change their benefit packages on an annual basis, the state would have to confirm continued non-coverage on a yearly basis.
• For insurers not included in a survey, or as an alternative to a survey, the state may establish a precedent file by initially billing the insurer to obtain documentation of non-coverage, so that future claims would not need to be submitted to that insurer. The state would have to confirm continued non-coverage on a yearly basis.
• The state may request verification from the state agency or commission that oversees compliance with state law and regulations governing insurance plans that a certain item or service is never covered in insurance policies available in the state, either for the general population or for a specific population segment (for example, children under age 21).  The state would have to confirm continued prohibition of coverage on a yearly basis.

For more information, please review the Coordination of Benefits and Third Party Liability (COB/TPL) in Medicaid Handbook.

Yes, a state can exempt a service from TPL requirements if it is never covered in the school setting, even if it is otherwise covered by the liable third party. Claims for the service in question delivered in a school setting must always be denied by the third party, and the state needs to maintain annual documentation substantiating that the service is not covered.

The State Medicaid Agency determines if medical necessity can be presumptive when services are preventive in nature and targeted at a general population group.  Medical necessity criterion is determined by the state in accordance with 42 CFR 440.230(d).   
 

The 2023 Comprehensive Guide to Medicaid Services and Administrative Claiming defines IDEA/IEP services where direct services may be delivered to an individual and/or group to ameliorate a specific condition and are performed in the presence of the student(s). All direct medical services should be outlined in the Medicaid State Plan and questions about specific classroom-based interventions should be directed to the State Medicaid Agency.

The requirement to perform a time study during vacation periods depends on the circumstances the LEA or the claiming unit faces. Each time study is independent, and the sample universe is determined before it is conducted; therefore, only employees performing Medicaid-related activities would be included in the sample universe for that time study period. The Random Moment Time Study (RMTS) must include LEAs that seek to bill and/or be paid for services. If the LEA does not want to participate in providing services, it will not be included in the sample universe.

Any LEA that bills for Medicaid services during any vacation period must be included in the RMTS for the period in question to ensure that all services allocable to Medicaid are captured. However, suppose an LEA will not bill for any services during the vacation period in question and does not include any vacation period expenditures in the cost report. In that case, they may be excluded from the study sample for that period. (For more information, see page 114 of the Comprehensive Guide)

Yes, provided the following conditions are met. As noted on page 99 of the 2023 Comprehensive Guide to Medicaid Services and Administrative Claiming under section G. Special Considerations for Transportation and Vaccines as SBS:

“School-based specialized transportation is defined as transportation to a medically necessary service (as outlined in the IEP of an enrolled Medicaid beneficiary) provided in a specially adapted vehicle that has been physically adjusted or designed to meet the needs of the individual student under IDEA (e.g., special harnesses, wheelchair lifts, ramps, specialized environmental controls, etc.) to accommodate students with disabilities in the school-based setting. Note: the presence of only an aide (on a non-adapted bus/vehicle) or simple seat belts do not make a vehicle specially adapted. Specialized transportation may consist of a specially modified, physically adapted school bus or other vehicle in the specialized transportation cost pool.” 

Under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), if a child with a disability is receiving special education and related services, transportation is included in the child’s IEP, and the IEP Team determines that the parent will be providing transportation, the LEA must reimburse the parents in a timely manner for the costs incurred in providing transportation. See the Office of Special Education Programs’ Questions and Answers on Serving Children with Disabilities Eligible for Transportation, November 2009. The LEA may request Medicaid reimbursement if the parent personal vehicle has been specially adapted consistent with the SBS guidance.

According to page 105 of the 2023 Comprehensive Guide to Medicaid Services and Administrative Claiming: 

“If TPL exists but does not cover the specific Medicaid services provided, the provider would have to furnish documentation to the State Medicaid agency that, although TPL generally exists for the beneficiary, there is no coverage for the services provided. After the documentation is given, the provider does not have to continually pursue TPL for the services provided which are not covered by the third party. At this point, the claim could be submitted to, and paid by, the State Medicaid agency. The provider would need to establish annually thereafter that coverage for those non-covered services has not changed. Many services covered by State Medicaid agencies under their Medicaid programs are not covered by otherwise liable third parties of Medicaid beneficiaries. As such, the provider would not need to pursue TPL every time the service was furnished as long as it was demonstrated such coverage is not available by otherwise liable third parties.” 

“If the probable existence of TPL cannot be established or third-party benefits are not available to pay the recipient's medical expenses at the time the claim is filed, the agency must pay the full amount allowed under the agency's payment schedule.”

“Reimbursement must be sought unless it is determined that recovery of reimbursement would not be cost effective in accordance with threshold amounts that have been established by the State Medicaid agency.” 

There are some circumstances, however, under which a state Medicaid agency may pay a claim even if a third party is likely liable and then seek to recoup that payment from the liable third party. This is referred to as “pay and chase.” Specifically, pay and chase is required or permitted in the following circumstances:

Medical Support Enforcement:  State Medicaid agencies must pay and chase if the claim is for a service provided to an individual on whose behalf child support enforcement is being carried out if (1) the third party coverage is through an absent parent and (2) the provider certifies that, if the provider has billed a third party, the provider has waited up to 100 days from the date of service without receiving payment before billing Medicaid (42 CFR § 433.139(b)(3)(ii)). This requirement is intended to protect the custodial parent and the dependent children from having to pursue the non-custodial parent, his/her employer, or insurer for third party liability.

Preventive Pediatric Services:  State Medicaid agencies must pay and chase for claims for preventive pediatric services (including EPSDT) (42 CFR § 433.139(b)(3)), unless the state has made a determination related to cost-effectiveness and access to care that warrants cost avoidance for up to 90 days.

After a state Medicaid agency pays a claim using the pay and chase method, it must then seek to recover from the liable third party, unless the recovery of reimbursement would not be cost-effective or documentation exists that there is no coverage for the services by the liable third party.

No, States may opt to maintain their current approach, including a fee schedule approach, if the existing State Plan Amendment (SPA) and underlying implementation mechanisms are compliant with all of the federal requirements discussed in the new SBS Guide. The newly introduced flexibilities are available options for States, but their adoption is not mandatory. If a State wants to depart from its currently approved SBS payment and/or claiming approach, including replacing a current fee schedule methodology or providing higher fee schedule payment amounts, a SPA is necessary.

No, generally, States that employ a State plan payment methodology that reimburses a provider for the actual cost of Medicaid services and/or administrative activities may not use a fee schedule rate as a proxy for cost. Instead, states must use cost identification methodologies and supporting documentation methods that are consistent with the requirements of 45 C.F.R. Part 75 and approved by CMS.

When a State relies on a unit of government to fund the non-federal share of Medicaid expenditures through a Certified Public Expenditure (CPE), the reimbursement to the provider is limited to the actual, incurred cost of providing Medicaid services or administrative activities. In those circumstances, a State must use the cost finding and documentation principles that are discussed in 45 C.F.R. Part 75 to determine the amounts that may be reimbursed for Medicaid activities. These costs must be reconciled.

Generally, yes, but how this is achieved is dependent on the reimbursement methodology the State has approved for SBS in its Medicaid State plan. If SBS in a State are paid through fee for service (FFS), then each billed service is claimed and paid as provided in the State plan, regardless of when it occurs.

If a State has a cost methodology in the State plan that uses a time study, the time study must include 100% of providers’ billable time and account for their regular schedules in the methodology and in the time study implementation plan (TSIP). In this case, the providers’ schedules should include after-school hours for programs that are intended to be captured. If these programs are contracted, the contracted costs must also be included in the cost report. If a State does not currently have these programs included in their approved SBS reimbursement methodology, the methodology may have to be amended to capture the additional services. This may include revisions to the SPA, TSIP, PACAP, or other documents, as needed.

In the case of summer activities (i.e., non-regular school days when schools are not capturing any Medicaid services), a time study should be performed to cover these periods. Anytime there are Medicaid services performed and captured in a cost methodology, that time needs to be accounted for in the CMS-approved TSIP, and the allocations explained in the SPA. This is especially true for children with Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) who are eligible for Medicaid and require special education and related services after school hours, on weekends, and/or extended school year services (defined in 34 C.F.R § 300.106). SMAs must have procedures in effect that allow for time studies to capture 100% of providers’ time delivering extended school year services. No estimations of Medicaid services can be calculated for vacation or other periods not covered in the time study.