U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

RI-20-0003

CMS is approving this time-limited state plan amendment to respond to the COVID-19 national emergency. The purposes of this amendment is to expand eligibility to cover COVID-19 testing for uninsured individuals, make other eligibility and enrollment changes, suspend premiums for the Employed Individuals with Disabilities program eligibility group, automatically renew prior authorization for medications, and adjust post eligibility treatment of income

ND-20-0009

CMS is approving this time-limited state plan amendment to respond to the COVID-19 national emergency. The purposes of this amendment is to suspend premiums for the Employed Individuals with Disabilities program eligibility group, make adjustments to prior authorization and the day supply or quantity limit for covered outpatient drugs, suspend the Qualified Service Provider qualifications regarding competency and state criteria, waive the timelines for nursing facility rate reconsiderations and appeals, and waive the 15 day limit for payment for a reserved bed for an inpatient hospitalization.

How will states with Medicaid managed care programs comply with the requirement to report provider participation levels specified in 42 CFR 447.400(d)(1)?

At this time, the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is not defining the form of information required under 42 CFR 447.400(d)(1), but we do suggest that states with Medicaid managed care programs conduct a baseline assessment of primary care access before the provision goes into effect. This baseline assessment will ensure that Congress, CMS, and researchers have comparative data to evaluate this provision.

Supplemental Links:

When will the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) provide standardized contract language reflecting

CMS will be working collaboratively with the National Association of Medicaid Directors (NAMD) to develop the contract elements necessary to reflect the requirements of this rule. In recognition of the State Medicaid Agency's role in the contracting practice, CMS will describe the suggested content areas rather than issue standardized contractual language. These elements will be described in further detail in a future (Question and Answer) Q&A document.

Supplemental Links:

Can managed care plans under contract with a state use their own definitions of primary care providers and services for purposes of complying with CMS 2370-F rule?

While we recognize that health plans may have unique definitions of primary care providers and services, the availability of the increased Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP) is limited to the scope of eligible primary care providers and primary care services as defined in statute and implemented by this rule.

Supplemental Links:

ME-20-0006 and ME-20-0006-B

Updates the CS21 SPA to provide temporary adjustments to the state’s premium lock-out period in response to disaster events. ME-20-0006-B provides temporary adjustments to the state's cost-sharing requirements, application and redetermination policies, verification requirements, and tribal consultation process in response to disaster events.

Is there information on when states will make payments to contracted health plans to account for the Health Insurance Providers Fee?

Information on when states intend to reimburse contracted health plans for the Health Insurance Providers Fee is established in the contract. States that elect to reimburse health plans for the fee once the amount is known should establish a timeframe for payment, typically between 30 to 90 days, after receipt and review of the health plan's assessment from the Internal Revenue Service.

Supplemental Links:

How should a state account for a health plan's liability for the Health Insurance Providers Fee if a health plan contracted with a state in 2013 but does not continue that relationship in 2014?

CMS believes that the process for reimbursing a health plan for the Health Insurance Providers Fee that was contracted with the state in 2013, but not in 2014, is primarily a matter to be negotiated between the state and the health plan. It is reasonable for a state to make a retroactive adjustment to the 2013 contract year rates for that health plan as it is possible that the state's actuary did not take the Health Insurance Providers Fee into consideration when developing the 2013 rates.

How should states address the exclusion of long-term care premiums from the plan's Health Insurance Providers Fee calculation?

Section 9010(h)(3) of the Affordable Care Act and the IRS Health Insurance Providers Fee regulations (78 FR 71476, 71483, November 29, 2013; available at www.irs.gov/businesses/corporations/affordable-care-act-provision-9010) exclude long-term care from the definition of health insurance for purposes of calculating a health plan's fee liability.