If a woman indicates on the application that she is pregnant, she should be enrolled in Medicaid coverage as a pregnant woman. The Affordable Care Act specifies that pregnant women are not eligible for the new adult group. As mentioned above, if a woman enrolled in the adult group later becomes pregnant, she will have the option to stay enrolled in the adult group or request that the State move her to a pregnancy-related eligibility group.

States are not required to track the pregnant status of women enrolled through the new adult group. Women who enroll in the adult group who later become pregnant will have the option of either staying enrolled in the adult group, or requesting that the State move them to a pregnancy-related eligibility group. This is most likely to occur if women need specific benefits that are not available under the adult group benchmark benefit package.

The Medicaid eligibility final rule at 435.110, 435.116 and 435.118 set forth the mechanism for consolidating certain federal eligibility categories into four main groupings: adults, children, pregnant women and parents/caretaker relatives. The table provided below lays out the consolidation of mandatory and optional eligibility groups (a version of this table was also included as part of the preamble to the proposed rule).

Realignment of Medicaid Eligibility Groups

In a State where the Exchange makes Medicaid and CHIP eligibility assessments, but not eligibility determinations, there are certain requirements that the Exchange must follow (found at 42 CFR 155.302(b)) in order to ensure a smooth transition between programs. When an eligibility assessment reveals that an applicant is potentially eligible for Medicaid or CHIP, the Exchange must transmit the individual's electronic account to the Medicaid or CHIP agency for completion of the eligibility determination.

The requirements are different, but they are not in conflict. The 45-day limit for Medicaid is the outer boundary limit by which a State must determine Medicaid eligibility for all individuals who apply on a basis other than disability, and as discussed above, we expect much quicker determinations in most cases. The Medicaid program provides a reasonable opportunity period for individuals whose citizenship or immigration status cannot be verified. Medicaid provides benefits for individuals during their reasonable opportunity period, who are otherwise eligible for Medicaid.

As reconfigured under the final regulation of July 5, 2017, MEQC will work in conjunction with the Payment Error Rate Measurement (PERM) program. In those years when states undergo their triennial PERM reviews, the states will not conduct MEQC pilots. The latter will only be required in the two off-years between PERM review years. CMS has restructured the MEQC program so that it more effectively complements the PERM program and provides states with the necessary flexibility and opportunity to target specific problems or high-interest areas during the two off-years of the PERM cycle.

The single streamlined application will contain questions that are designed to identify individuals who may be eligible for Medicaid on a basis other than MAGI. Today, many States use a simplified application that includes questions about disability status or the need for longterm care. The single streamlined application will have similar questions to help identify individuals who may need a Medicaid determination on a basis other than MAGI. Once identified, the individuals would be asked to complete a supplemental application, or a separate application for non-MAGI groups.

The goal is to have a seamless experience for consumers, with eligibility determinations made as quickly as possible regardless of which approach to eligibility determinations is in effect in a particular State. CMS will be establishing, in collaboration with States and with an opportunity for public input, data reporting measures that will allow States, CMS and the public to have information about the enrollment process including the timing of eligibility determinations under different design approaches.

Yes. CMS is working with States to develop a model agreement, and it is one of the tools that the Coverage Expansion Learning Collaborative will be considering.

Supplemental Links:

• This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 46.1 KB)