U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

How does Medicaid Eligibility Quality Control (MEQC) differ from Payment Error Rate Measurement (PERM)?

The MEQC requirements on active case reviews generally mirror the requirements of the eligibility component of PERM reviews. The regulation requires that states perform reviews of a sample of active Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) cases to identify new eligibility approvals and renewals that were made in error. As in PERM, states will be required to submit case-level reports on the sampled cases they review and corrective action plans that describe steps taken to remediate the errors found.

Section 1135 Waiver Flexibilities - Puerto Rico Coronavirus Disease 2019

On March 13, 2020, pursuant to section 1135(b) of the Act, the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services invoked his authority to waive or modify certain requirements of titles XVIII, XIX, and XXI of the Act as a result of the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic, to the extent necessary, as determined by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)

Collections:

What information will be included in the required verification plan? Will CMS provide a model

The final rule specifies that Medicaid and CHIP agencies will establish their verification policies and procedures in a verification plan. This plan is not a required element of the Medicaid State plan but States suggested, and CMS agrees, that it will be helpful to have the each State's eligibility verification process established in a written plan. The verification plans will serve many purposes, including ensuring PERM reviews are mindful of the State's verification policies and also for promoting coordination with the Exchange.

What happens with the medically needy group in 2014 and what are the policy options to continue covering this group? Is that group newly eligible with 100% federal match?

States may continue to provide coverage to medically needy individuals in 2014, and indeed are required to offer such coverage with respect to children until the maintenance of effort requirement provision in section 1902(gg) of the Act expires. States have the option to discontinue coverage under medically needy groups for adults (e.g., disabled individuals with income above the standard for categorical eligibility) in 2014, subject to section 1902(gg).

Will states need to modify already approved contracts to add the final capitation rates to

Yes. We remind states that the requirement that the final capitation rate be specified in the contract is not a new requirement, see section 438.6(c)(2)(ii) of the 2002 final rule. The amount of payment for performance-in this context, the final capitation rate-is a primary component of any contract and must be included for purposes of verifying claims for Federal Financial Participation (FFP) on the CMS-64.

Can individuals with disabilities and other long-term care needs (who are not eligible in the

Yes. People with disabilities or who need long term care services and supports may qualify under the new adult group in 2014 if they meet the MAGI-based eligibility standards for that group. In addition, under the final eligibility and enrollment rule, eligibility for the new adult group based on MAGI does not preclude eligibility for coverage under an optional group that might be otherwise excepted from MAGI methods.

In 2014, what happens to existing groups like section 1931 and Transitional Medical Assistance (TMA)?

Coverage under section 1931 of the Act was not repealed with the ACA and will remain in effect in 2014. As noted in the table above, eligibility for parents and caretaker relatives under section 1931 is implemented at section 435.110 of the regulations; eligibility for pregnant women under section 1931 is implemented at section 435.116 and eligibility for children at section 435.118. TMA under section 1925 of the Act will sunset on December 31, 2012, unless extended by Congress.

In 2014, will the eligibility groups for people with breast and cervical cancer and disabled workers continue to exist?

Yes, the breast and cervical cancer group and the eligibility group for working disabled individuals will remain optional eligibility groups which States may elect. The Affordable Care Act did not alter the financial or non-financial requirements or methodologies used to determine eligibility for these groups, both of which are exempt from the application of Modified Adjusted Gross Income (MAGI) methodology for determining income.