U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

How are AMPs determined for drugs not available from retail community pharmacies that are also

As discussed in the final rule (81 FR 5250), if a specialty pharmacy meets the definition of a retail community pharmacy at section 1927(k)(10) of the Act, sales for such drugs would be included in AMP. This is true even in the event there are a low number of AMP eligible sales. Because CMS is permitting manufacturers to use a presumed inclusion approach when calculating AMP, and to make reasonable assumptions, an AMP will likely be generated for such drugs.

Is there a threshold for determining the amount of prescriptions that are delivered through the

As noted in the comment and response in the preamble to the final rule (81 FR 5216), CMS declined to set a threshold in order to allow flexibility to recognize changes that take place in the pharmaceutical marketplace with regard to mail order business. CMS further noted that manufacturers may make reasonable assumptions that a pharmacy is a retail community pharmacy when the majority of the drugs are not dispensed through the mail. A "majority" is generally determined as greater than 50 percent, which could be interpreted as greater than 50 percent.

Please verify that the AAC methodology for determining Medicaid reimbursement will only apply to FFS

The provisions of this final rule related to pharmacy payments do not apply to MCO payment or reimbursement methodologies, including MCO providers participating in the 340B program.

Supplemental Links:

Are drugs reimbursed through the encounter rate eligible for rebates through the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program?

As stated in the above response, reimbursement to IHS and Tribal providers through the encounter rate is an option available to all states as a means to satisfying the requirement to reimburse such providers in accordance with the requirements at 42 CFR 447.518(a)(2).

In the SMD letter (#16-001) published on February 11, 2016, CMS indicated that states that

Reimbursement to IHS and Tribal providers through the encounter rate is an option available to all states as a means to satisfying the requirement to reimburse such providers in accordance with the requirements at 42 CFR 447.518(a)(2).

Supplemental Links:

Can CMS provide further clarification regarding what is meant by "nationwide availability," especially with respect to drugs that are experiencing shortages?

A FUL will only be calculated when pharmaceutically and therapeutically equivalent multiple source drug products are available for purchase by retail community pharmacies on a nationwide basis (see 81 FR 5300, 5302-5304).

Since the FULs are effective April 1, 2016, but States have 4 quarters to revise

Pharmacy provider reimbursement rates should be consistent with efficiency, economy, and quality of care while assuring sufficient beneficiary access, in accordance with section 1902(a)(30)(A) of the Act. As states revise their reimbursement for the ingredient cost of a drug to stay within the FUL, they should also consider whether their current dispensing fee continues to provide adequate reimbursement for the cost of dispensing a prescription to a Medicaid beneficiary, as well as the need to submit a SPA.