Frequently Asked Questions are used to provide additional information and/or statutory guidance not found in State Medicaid Director Letters, State Health Official Letters, or CMCS Informational Bulletins. The different sets of FAQs as originally released can be accessed below.
Frequently Asked Questions
Are bonus payments and other incentive arrangements for health plans included in the CMS 2370-F methodology for determining the rate differential that is eligible for 100 percent (Federal Financial Plan) FFP?
We addressed the treatment of bonus payments and other incentive arrangements in terms of identifying the 2009 base rate in the final rule and take this opportunity to clarify that such arrangements are similarly excluded from the methodology for determining the rate differential.
Supplemental Links:
FAQ ID:94236
SHARE URLIs the relevant Medicare rate both the 'floor' and 'ceiling' for health plan payments to eligible providers for eligible services under CMS 2370-F?
The applicable Medicare rate does effectively become the "floor" for payments to eligible providers for eligible services, but not the "ceiling." Health plans may pay above that rate depending on their specific contractual arrangements with providers.
Supplemental Links:
FAQ ID:94246
SHARE URLWill Medicaid health plans be required to pay eligible providers the higher rate prior to receiving payment from the State for the higher rate?
While some plans may be able to pay the higher rate prior to receiving state funds, the final rule does not obligate a health plan to pay eligible providers the higher rate until they have been provided the funds to do so.
Supplemental Links:
FAQ ID:94251
SHARE URLMay providers self-attest through the use of a claims modifier to qualify for CMS 2370-F?
The State will issue a communication instructing providers that only those who are board-certified in a specified specialty/subspecialty or who meet the 60 percent threshold of appropriate claims history are eligible to receive the rate increase.
Supplemental Links:
FAQ ID:94271
SHARE URLCan a state review providers whose claims meet the 60 percent threshold and assume that those providers would be automatically eligible?
Each physician must self-attest to being a qualified provider. It is not appropriate for a state to rely on a modifier to a claim for the initial self-attestation. Under the final rule, states are not required to independently verify the eligibility of each and every physician who might qualify for higher payment. Therefore, it is important that documentation exist that the physicians themselves supplied a proper attestation. That attestation has two parts. Physicians must attest to an appropriate specialty designation and also must further attest to whether that status is based on either being Board certified or to having the proper claims history. Once the signed self-attestation is in the hands of the Medicaid agency, claims may be identified for higher payment through the use of a modifier.
Supplemental Links:
FAQ ID:94276
SHARE URLWith respect to the use of board certification to confirm a physician's self-attestation for CMS 2370-F eligibility must the physician's board status be current or is initial board certification sufficient?
The certification must be current. If it has lapsed but the physician still practices as an eligible specialist the self-attestation would need to be supported with a 60 percent claims history.
Supplemental Links:
FAQ ID:94296
SHARE URLCMS clarified in the final rule for CMS 2370-F that, for out of state providers, the beneficiary's home state (e.g., state A) may defer to the determination of the physician's home state (e.g., state B) with respect to eligibility for higher payment. However, if states A and B receive different Medicare locality adjustments, which locality rate must be paid?
As with all Medicaid services, the state in which the beneficiary is determined eligible (state A) sets the payment rate for services. Therefore, state A would be responsible for paying using the methodology it had chosen with respect to determining the appropriate Medicare rate and would not be required to pay the rate the physician would receive from state B.
Supplemental Links:
FAQ ID:94361
SHARE URLWhen does the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) plan to issue a correction to the mistake they noted during the call with Medicaid agencies regarding payment under CMS 2370-F at the lesser of a provider's billed charge or the Medicare rate?
The correction was published in the Federal Register on December 14, 2012. In it CMS clarified that states must reimburse providers the lower or the provider’s charge or the applicable Medicare rate.
Supplemental Links:
FAQ ID:94376
SHARE URLIf a physician presents a certificate for CMS 2370-F eligibility from one of the defined boards, can the certificate be used as the legal document verifying the physician's certification or does the State have to verify with the board that the physician is certified and that the presented certificate is still active and valid?
States may accept the certificate and need not verify. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) expects states to make physicians aware that they are responsible for providing accurate information.
FAQ ID:92686
SHARE URLThe final rule for CMS 2370-F indicated that 100 percent Federal Financial Participation (FFP) is not available for stand-alone Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) plans. What criteria should be used to determine if a plan is a stand-alone CHIP plan? What agency will determine if a plan is a stand-alone CHIP plan?
The Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) approves CHIP programs as stand-alone or Medicaid expansions. Information on whether or not a particular state operates a stand-alone or expansion program is available at http://medicaid.gov/Medicaid-CHIP-Program-Information/By-Topics/Childrens-Health-Insurance-Program-CHIP/Downloads/Map-CHIP-Program-Designs-by-State-.pdf (PDF, 120.65 KB).
FAQ ID:92696
SHARE URL
Results per page