Frequently Asked Questions

We do not believe the statue requires states to cover, under this group, individuals who were in foster care and enrolled in Medicaid when they turned age 18 or aged out of foster care in a different state. However, we believe the statute provides states the option to do so. As noted above, pending publication of a final regulation at section 435.150, states may exercise the option proposed when they complete SPA page S33 for this group.

Supplemental Links:

• This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 120.92 KB)

FAQ ID:92166

Yes. Section 115 of CHIPRA gives states the option to claim expenditures for Medicaid expansion program populations under section 1905(u)(2)(B) of the Act, either at the enhanced FMAP rate using title XXI funds or at the regular FMAP rate using title XIX funds. States that elect to claim expenditures under title XXI will receive the enhanced FMAP rate. However, states that elect to claim expenditures under title XIX will receive the regular Medicaid FMAP rate. Claims submitted at the enhanced FMAP rate will be paid from the state's CHIP allotment.

Supplemental Links:

• This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 120.92 KB)

FAQ ID:92171

IV&V contractor activities must still be performed such as checklist evaluation, artifact review and preparation of IV&V Progress Reports. The state should provide a plan and timeline for how these activities will be supported and performed until the proper IV&V contract can be either procured or aligned with updated CMS guidance on IV&V.

FAQ ID:94866

As contained in the MECT standard RFP/contract language required by CMS, CMS does not cover activities that the state may require of the IV&V contractor during ongoing O&M. However, as Medicaid is moving away from monolithic single applications, it is expected that states will continuously update and replace modules in their enterprise. Therefore, IV&V should always have a role to ensure successful integration and testing.

FAQ ID:94881

If an organization is performing another role (such as systems integrator, PMO, quality assurance, etc.) on the MMIS or E&E project, it may not perform the IV&V function on the same project. A state may contract the same vendor to perform the IV&V role for both its E&E and MMIS projects.

FAQ ID:94886

To reduce potential conflict of interest, CMS is ensuring that states are arranging IV&V services through contracts that should be owned outside of the agency that owns the MMIS or E&E project. The oversight organization for the IV&V contractor should not be involved in oversight of the development effort, a stakeholder in the business implementation, or the DDI contractor. The IV&V contract monitor should be aware of system development problem solving, reporting, and contractor management. This contract oversight provides true independence between the IV&V contractor and system development teams. This requirement is consistent with other HHS agencies' practices and industry best practices.

FAQ ID:94891

We are working with states to help them complete all of the steps needed to implement the new adult group on January 1, 2014. States need to make changes and updates to their Medicaid state plan (and sometimes waiver programs) as expeditiously as possible, so they can accurately determine who is eligible, assist individuals with enrollment, contract with health care plans, provide access to quality care health care for their beneficiaries, and receive federal financial assistance for these costs. They will also need to submit state plan amendments (SPAs) describing how they will claim the appropriate federal medical assistance percentage (FMAP) for expenditures for the new adult group. In addition, states will need to submit their budget estimates related to the new adult group, so CMS can provide funding at the appropriate levels.

Supplemental Links:

• This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 120.92 KB)

FAQ ID:91736

As states compile their budget estimates for the first calendar quarter of 2014, or for future quarters, states that will adopt the new adult group should include in those estimates the impact of the increased newly eligible FMAP rates available for the new adult group. CMS typically issues quarterly grant awards prior to the beginning of the quarter, so that states can make payments to Medicaid providers during the quarter. We will issue grant awards associated with expenditures related to the new adult group once eligibility SPAs reflecting the new adult group have been approved and the associated FMAP SPAs have been submitted.

For states that have not yet reached these milestones, CMS can quickly issue supplemental grant awards once the new adult group SPA is approved and the FMAP SPA is submitted. States expanding coverage are likely to achieve these milestones early in the quarter but, as always, SPAs do not need to be submitted until the end of the quarter to be made effective retroactively to the beginning of the quarter. CMS is working with states to secure approval of new adult group eligibility SPAs on an expedited basis, and will provide technical assistance as needed so that states can submit their FMAP SPAs in a timely manner.

After the grant award reflecting estimated new adult expenditures is issued, states will be able to draw down federal funds during the quarter, in advance of submitting claims for such expenditures. Finally, as is our regular process, states can begin claiming for expenditures made during the quarter following the close of the quarter, subject to approval of all required eligibility, benefit, and FMAP SPAs. States that do not have approved SPAs can claim retroactively after approval is granted, as long as timely filing requirements are met.

States with waivers should note that, as always, waivers are prospective only - so any waiver changes need to be submitted and approved by January 1, 2014 if a state if trying to make coverage effective on that date.

Supplemental Links:

• This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 120.92 KB)

FAQ ID:91741

Typically, grant awards exclude any amounts associated with unapproved SPAs. If the eligibility SPA for a state is approved after the initial grant award to the state was issued (and which, therefore, would not have included amounts for the new adult group), the state could subsequently submit a request for additional funds at any time during the quarter once the eligibility SPA was approved. We consider the approval of the eligibility SPA for the new adult group to provide the necessary basis and authority for this grant action. However, to ensure that states demonstrate they will be able to claim federal funds properly, grant awards will also be contingent upon the submission (but not approval) of an FMAP claiming SPA. These steps will enable states to draw down federal funds during the quarter. However, states must still have all applicable SPAs (eligibility, benefits, and FMAP) approved before they claim expenditures on the CMS-64 after the quarter has closed. If they don't, they can claim retrospectively once approval is granted, as long as timely filing requirements are met. It is important to note that retroactive claiming is not possible when eligibility is triggered by a section 1115 waiver.

Supplemental Links:

• This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 120.92 KB)

FAQ ID:91746

We noted in a previous FAQ released on May 22, 2012 (available at: http://www.medicaid.gov/sites/default/files/state-resource-center/FAQ-medicaid-and-chip-affordable-care-act-implementation/downloads/Eligibility-Policy-FAQs.pdf (PDF, 81.8 KB)), states are not required to track the pregnancy status of women enrolled in the adult group, and are not required to move them to the eligibility group for pregnant women if the state becomes aware of their pregnancy outside of the regular redetermination process. Women who become pregnant must be given the option of moving to the pregnancy-related coverage category, and states must inform women of the differences in coverage between the adult group and pregnancy-related coverage (including any differences in benefits, premiums and cost sharing) so that pregnant women can make an informed choice about reporting the pregnancy and changing their eligibility status between regular renewals. We clarify that, at a regularly scheduled renewal, states must determine whether a current beneficiary enrolled in the adult group meets all eligibility criteria to remain eligible in the adult group. If at that time the state is aware that a woman is pregnant (either because of ex parte information confirmed during the renewal process by the state or through the return of a pre-populated renewal form from the woman), she no longer would meet the requirements for eligibility under the new adult group and, if otherwise eligible for coverage based on pregnancy, must instead be enrolled in the pregnant women's group. The state may give a pregnant woman the option to remain enrolled in the same alternate benefit package she is enrolled in through the new adult group, to minimize any disruption to her coverage or access to providers. Note that if the state covers any additional benefits for pregnant women under 42 CFR 440.250(p) not provided to other individuals eligible under the state plan, such benefits also must be provided to pregnant women enrolled in such alternative benefit package. Between regular renewals, if a woman enrolled in the adult group who becomes pregnant does not elect to switch groups and remains in the adult group, her status for FMAP purposes (as newly eligible or not) is unchanged until her next regularly scheduled redetermination. If, consistent with the policy described above, her enrollment is transferred to the pregnant women's group either prior to or at the point of her regular renewal, regular FMAP would apply because she would no longer be in the adult group.

Supplemental Links:

• This FAQ was released as part of a larger set. View the full set. (PDF, 120.92 KB)

FAQ ID:91751